I didn't include the clip (there's no B&S), but Billy says that a question on...(More)

I didn't include the clip (there's no B&S), but Billy says that a question on bees was "the question [he] missed on the test" to which he got a B. So Ms. Appleby dropped a WHOLE LETTER GRADE for ONE QUESTION. Yaaay, the American education system! I really like how Skull's editing the book. Who is some published author to say what's what or not? Just because someone who isn't us writes down the information, doesn't mean it's correct. It's so nice that Bulk and Skull are interested in older women. Usually there's the double-standard that "men are generally older than women" in relationships. It's a sad fact that women in general are still valued for their youth rather than their minds, and it's just so nice that B&S would want to help out with their self-defense lessons. On the other hand, if you actually believe these women wouldn't be acting nastier to each other, you must be very blessed to have never set foot in a Wal-Mart before. The "Moms" that Bulk and Skull spar with seem more like they'd be the muggers. Immortal line: "Two moms are better than one." YES. YES THEY ARE. Just ignore Zack's rant about juggling being the Rapture. The PRs are so peppy and oblivious, they're willing to exaggerate the good qualities in the most negligible activities. That's also what drugusers do all the time to defend their habit. Zack is obviously NOT on drugs, of course, dummies. That's called "putting things into perspective". And what are these "submarine races"? Bulk and Skull don't appear much in the cheerleading episode. It's hard to believe they'd "fail" at that, too, since all it requires is rhyming and waving around those McDonalds fries monsters, and, if you attended my high school, flashing your panties to the senior class. Once again, "flashing your panties to the senior class". Clear enough for you? Good. It's nice that Skull is the contestant, since it's probably noticeable that Bulk tends to attract most of the attention. Make no mistake: it's Bulk AND Skull! Accept no substitutes. So why does Kimberly feel the need to dump Skull's face into a bowl of soylent green? Poor sportsmanship, seems like! This "Trick or Treat" game show, besides being oddly seasonal for a game show, makes little to no sense, in the classic PR fashion. Having only two contestants is boring, for one thing. Only Bulk clapping for Skull is incredibly rude for a studio audience and isn't good sportsmanship. And what kind of game show do the contestants ask the host the questions? This is about as much a game show as "Whose Line is it Anyway?". Of course, there's no need to mention how game show prizes are nothing but added complications (taxes, car payments, etc). The "misinterpreting rhetoric" joke when the host counts Skull's "I do?" question as a game question is about as funny as watching your grandmother get raped by a terrorist. Even the host realizes how weak and painfully unfunny that was as he reads his lines. Also, asking a question he wouldn't know the answer to is not a "trick" question. Take note of the host's attitude towards Skull. Apparently audience participation is cheating, though you'd expect that on any game show the audience wouldn't be able to shut up. Of course the fact that Bulk and Skull are supposedly cheating to come up with questions the host won't know the answer to is ridiculously contrived. Ask him to explain that stupid Schroedinger's cat theory that doesn't actually explain anything. Then for some reason the audience feels compelled to applaud Skull when he gets to play the "Wall of Disaster" game. Of course, they're most likely just applauding the game's introduction, moreso than they did for Skull's introduction. Technically, who cares who's playing on a game show anyway? Plus, they should have gotten Ian Buchanan to play the host, so he could add another vampire role to his repertoire.(Less)