Search results for rape drug 2
4510, 
03:20, 
2007-11-11 18:07:08 Description: Bro. Eli Soriano MTV - Ma...RAPE kitang MULI
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES
VS
Eliseo F. Soriano
Criminal Case No. 06-3898
WARRANT OF ARREST - "Rape under Article 266-A"
TAGS: (More) Bro. Eli Soriano MTV - Ma...RAPE kitang MULI
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES
VS
Eliseo F. Soriano
Criminal Case No. 06-3898
WARRANT OF ARREST - "Rape under Article 266-A"
TAGS: Rape SCANDAL Rapist MANIAC Date Rape PSA Bro Rape: A Newsline Investigative Report Date Rape Tifa new rape movie TOY RECALL AQUA DOTS - when swallowed Date rape drug effects Rape of Nanking Nanjing Massacre Part 2 Atrocities in Asia Guy tries to rape girl got killed Fullmetal Alchemist - Date Rape Sublime - Date Rape live! turtle rape Nanjing Massacre Rape of Nanking Part Tamil rape Rape of Nanking Nanjing Massacre Part I Atrocities in Asia RAPE BABY Massage Rape Be Aware of the Risks of Date Rape Drugs Family Rape (Extended) GH~Emily's Rape~GH Hentai Girl Rape Abuse US trained Ethiopian soldiers rape poor Somali women Shelly and Andrew Rape in JAMBA Pinoy gays vs the Visiting Forces Agreement unxigned - rape me (nirvana cover) Rape Me SCANDAL: Eli Soriano Scandal - RAPE Pinay Rape / Parausan sa Saudi NEWS JOEY DE LEON and the PEPSI PALOMA RAPE SCANDAL Rape murder hostage.... holcaust teachings worsen the sanity Rape!! Wanna Get Raped?
Pinay Rape / Parausan sa Saudi NEWS BANDILA: PINAY NI RAPE SA SAUDI :[ SCANDAL: Eli Soriano Scandal - RAPE Scandal: ELI SORIANO SCANDAL - Komiks ni Eli Soriano com Sexy Pinay chatter Rhoda part 2 pinay scandal(hercilinda oviedo) aka (jewel,hershey)2 Free Pinay Scandal Sites Ruffa Mae Pinoy Scandal/ Mabuhay ang Pilipinas! Pinay Cebu Scandal Pinay Scandals (UPDATED!!!) ICCT Colleges Foundation scandal part 1 of 2 pinay sex scandal in israel...... Scandal: ELI SORIANO SCANDAL - Komiks ni Eli Soriano cebu scandal pinay cam cyber sex vol.1 CEBU SCANDAL PINAY CAM CYBER SEX vol.2 Half Pinay Binosohan - Scandal SCANDAL: Eli Soriano Scandal - RAPE Re: Pinoy Dream Academy Irish Fullerton sexy bikini scandal ICCT Colleges Foundation scandal part 2 of 2 claudine barretto SCANDAL Bikini Open 2006 @BAAO - Complete Version KOMIKS: Eli Soriano SCANDAL - Komiks
Notes On A Scandal - Trailer Jollibee Scandal: Stop mascot sex scandal video Scandal, Patty Smyth - Goodbye To You PARIS HILTON SEX VIDEO SCANDAL Angel Locsin Scandal Pt.6 Scandal Scandal - The Warrior With Lyrics Scandal...Scandal Scandal - The Warrior With Lyrics kangta and vaness- scandal mv Madness - Shame & Scandal ICT scandal zhang yu video tape movie scandal (NSFW) Another Giuliani 9/11 Scandal Queen - Scandal Audition Online PH Scandal 2 ZTE SCANDAL Scandal - Vaness & Kangta Makati Scandal
mountain view college philippines scandal Audition Online PH Scandal 2 Pinoy Scandal 4 (Philippines) Audition Online PH Scandal Fanservice philippines Women's University Scandal Mr. Philippines Scandal a bit of philippine politics......philippines scandal Pinoy Scandal 5 (Philippines) Scandal: ELI SORIANO SCANDAL - Komiks ni Eli Soriano mountain view college philippines
scandal
abs cbn, scandal, philippines , artist, show...puppet cock angel locsin willie joey wowowee 2 7 dayaan gmna abs cbn scandal philippines artist show WOWOWEE SCANDAL Joey at Willie nagsuntukan video scandal!...porn philippines scandal kabet up mtv manila newsroom peter a. philippines scandal
MANILA SCANDAL Robinsons Manila Scandal 2 Robinsons Manila Scandal IAS Manila Scandal SM Manila scandal manila scandal hawaiian dance manila scandal...sexy manila scandal Manila Garden Scandal manila sex scandal manila scandal to...yeeeeeh NUDE PINOY SCANDALUmiversity of the Philippines Manila Scandal manila scandal filipino manila girls scandal Worl Trade Center Scandal,Metro Manila Cebu City Sex Scandal - Ruth & Ephrem - Caught on Tape Cebu City Sex Scandal - Caught On Tape - Wonderful World pasay makati manila scandal Cebu City Sex Scandal - Mga Abnormal - CAUGHT ON TAPE (Less)
Channel: youtube Rate it: Rate:
13, 01:36, 2007-11-09 14:39:02 Description: From Orlando - There is a promising vaccine in the pipeline for smokers. Research has shown that 1 year after getting the vaccine 16% of people had quit smoking, as compared to 6% who received (More) From Orlando - There is a promising vaccine in the pipeline for smokers. Research has shown that 1 year after getting the vaccine 16% of people had quit smoking, as compared to 6% who received placebo. The vaccine is an antibody that binds to nicotine forming a complex that is too large to cross the blood-brain barrier, thus preventing the stimulation of brain cells.
From Washington - One of Walmart's top Christmas toys - Aqua Dots - is being recalled due to contamination with a chemical that converts into the date rape drug GHB. Many children worldwide are getting sick from ingesting these Chinese-made toys, exhibiting symptoms such as nausea, dizziness, seizures and loss of consciousness. If you own Aqua Dots, also called Bindeez Beans, you should throw them away.
From Oxford - Using an oral contraceptive raises the risk for cervical cancer. An analysis of 24 studies showed a 2 fold higher risk in those who used the pill for over 5 years. Those who stopped use for more than 10 years had no higher risk than those who had never used oral contraceptives.
And finally, back to Orlando - Which of these popular diets is the most heart friendly: Ornish, South Beach or Atkins? The 3 diets vary by amounts of fat - Atkins has 50%, South Beach has 30% and the Ornish diet has 10%. The answer? The Ornish and South Beach diets lowered LDL cholesterol by 10%, while the high-fat Atkins diet raised it by 7%.
For Insidermedicine in Depth, I'm Dr. Susan Sharma. (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: aqua bindeez birth cervix china cigarette control date dots ghb md nicotine patch pill quit rape smoking vaccine walmart
Rate it: Rate:
76, 01:19, 2009-10-10 22:36:17 Description: here is the download link of Hackear MSN hacktool v 1.2.mp4 here : h1.ripway.com i hope you enjoy!!! ignore this ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (More) here is the download link of Hackear MSN hacktool v 1.2.mp4 here : h1.ripway.com i hope you enjoy!!! ignore this ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dashboard Experience Walkthrough Gametrailers posted a Xbox 360 Dashboard Walkthrough Hacking gamertag Suspened paypal Free Xbox Live Generator HALO 3 General Instantly Easy 50 boosting Service free money Recon Armor PS3 Microsoft ELITE Master Chief machinima THE NEW XBOX DASHBOARD COMING END OF ... (Less)
Channel: youtube Rate it: Rate:
10, 03:20, 2008-11-09 14:50:30 Description: In Soviet Russia, drug does you!
The CIA was once criticized for testing LSD as a possible mind control drug on civilians and soldiers without their consent. As a result the Rockefeller Commission (More) In Soviet Russia, drug does you!
The CIA was once criticized for testing LSD as a possible mind control drug on civilians and soldiers without their consent. As a result the Rockefeller Commission was created by President Ford in order to monitor the CIA's illegal activities. However in the Soviet Union the use of enemy hostages as test subjects persisted. Here are their stories. (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: america berlin cia germany hitler lsd math nazil rape russia russian soviet stalin torture usa ussr
Rate it: Rate:
5, 04:17, 2008-05-27 07:09:40 Description: The song is "Heaven (Candlelight Mix)" by DJ Sammy.
CHAPTER 66
*With Nick and Leah (while everyone is in Lana's room)*
Nick: Leah?
Leah: (she's out of breath and you can (More) The song is "Heaven (Candlelight Mix)" by DJ Sammy.
CHAPTER 66
*With Nick and Leah (while everyone is in Lana's room)*
Nick: Leah?
Leah: (she's out of breath and you can tell she had been running) I... can't... do... this... anymore...
Nick: Do what? Are you ok?
Leah: Miley... Josh... plan... break... up...
Nick: What? Hold on, here, sit down, catch your breath.
Leah: (she sits down) Ok...
Nick: Ok, now what were you saying about Miley and Josh.
Leah: You got time?
Nick: Um, somewhat.
Leah: Ok. Miley followed you guys to Florida. She followed you guys around and she spied on yours and Lana's date. That's how she found out about Josh. She somehow got him to come out here from Texas and told him that he had to break you and Lana up...
Nick: Oh my gosh...
Leah: So last night while you and Lana were dancing, he spiked her drink with this date-rape drug thing. Hence, Lana's tiredness all of the sudden. Then he knew that she would be out of it and wanting to go back to the room so he waited until she left, then he swiped your key, went up to your room... and yeah, I think you know what happens next. She didn't want to kiss him... she was just to weak to push him off...
Nick: He really did try to rape her?
Leah: Yeah... I don't think he had the balls to follow through with it, but that was his "initial" plan.
Nick: So... everything Lana said was... the truth?
Leah: Yep. To bad you had to break up with her...
Nick: Come with me. (he grabbed Leah's hand and pulled her to Lana's room)
*In Lana's room (where the chapter ended, mini re-cap)*
Kevin: I'll get it. (he opens the door to see Nick and Leah standing there)
Nick: I need to talk to Lana.
Kevin: You know, I'm sure she doesn't want to talk to you.
Nick: What makes you say that?
Kevin: 2 seconds ago, she was screaming "I hate him! I never want to see him again!"
Nick: I guess I deserve that... can I at least come in? It is my room too...
Kevin: Not after tonight...
(Nick, Kevin and Leah walk in)
Lana: Who was it? (she sees Nick and her face drops) Get out. And hello Leah. You can stay.
Nick: Can I please talk to you?
Lana: I don't know, I mean I might LIE about getting almost raped again. I'm sure you don't want that do you?
Joe: Maybe we should let them talk... it might be for the best.
Kerry: Actually, I need to talk to you Joe...
Joe: You do?
Kerry: Yeah, I do...
Briana: Come on Kevin, let's leave these two alone. Scream if you need anything Lana.
Lana: Ok... (Kevin and Briana leave)
Kerry: You gonna be ok?
Lana: Yeah, Leah's my witness if anything goes wrong.
Joe: Ok, let's go Kerry. (they leave)
Caroline: Later chica. My parents are probably worried sick about me. See yeah. (she gives Lana a hug and leaves)
Lana: Now, what do you wan- (she was cut off by Nick's lips colliding with hers) What the crap!
Nick: I'm sorry, I believe you, Leah told me everything...
Lana: So... you believe Leah, but not me...
Nick: I'm really sorry, I didn't mean any of the stuff I said, I love you.
Lana: Nick... you can't just tell me you break up with me then tell me you love me and think everything is going to be ok...
Nick: I know... and I'm an idiot for that... don't worry, Caroline already gave me the right act...
Lana: Then hear it again. I gave you everything. Everything. Then you walk in on my ex-boyfriend trying to rape me and automatically think I'm cheating on you. You don't even listen to me, and just believe what you saw. That's not a good relationship. I thought you were better than that Nick, I honestly did. But you're just like Josh... I do nothing but I'm the one that ends up getting hurt in the end... after I give you everything! I'll have to think about this Nick... I don't know if we can ever get back together... (she gets up and grabs some of her stuff)
Nick: But... wait, what are you doing?
Lana: I'm sleeping in Kerry's room tonight... I'm sorry I just can't sleep in here.
Leah: Nick, I'm going to leave.
Lana: Hey Leah?
Leah: Yeah?
Lana: Thanks.
Leah: No problem, bye guys (she leaves)
Lana: See you in the morning Nick... (she opens the door and goes to Kerry's room)
Nick: (he runs his fingers through his hair and sits on the couch) I really screwed up this time...
*With Joe and Kerry (while Nick and Lana are talking)*
Joe: So what's up? Are you gonna accuse me of something again?
Kerry: No... I'm sorry... I believe you...
Joe: See you just- wait, what did you say?
Kerry: I believe you... and I'm sorry.
------------------------------------------
Eh, I ran out of room. Kinda the reason it just ENDED lol. What's gonna happen in the next chapter? GASP! Find out when I post it... eh, tonight or tomorrow. (Less)
Channel: youtube Rate it: Rate:
111, 08:08, 2008-04-21 16:16:09 Description: Sorry for the quality of the video. Had problems uploading the slide presentation so I recorded slide presentation with camcorder and was able to upload that recording but cam also apparently recorded (More) Sorry for the quality of the video. Had problems uploading the slide presentation so I recorded slide presentation with camcorder and was able to upload that recording but cam also apparently recorded breathing pattern. ________________________________________ 'S.A. cop charged with assault' San Antonio Express News article July 24, 2007 Detective Keith Alfaro is a 10 year veteran of the San Antonio Police Department. He is charged with second degree aggravated assault and evading and resisting arrest but he is currently out on a $12,000 bond and he is on paid administrative leave despite what happened. His victim is Tamara Vaughan. She is 18 years old. On Sunday July 22, 2007, She was swimming with family members in the community pool of a gated community. Detective Keith Alfaro was in the pool area smoking a cigar despite a pool rule prohibiting smoking and he was talking on his cell phone. When she asked him not to smoke, he told her "You (racial slur) need to go back to the east side where you belong. Just because you think you have money, you think you can stay where y'all want...If you want to act like a man...treat you like a man." 18 year old Tamara told how he punched her in the face with a closed fist then beat her on her head, neck, chin, and her arms. She said he punched her about 25 times and also choked her. He kept beating her until he finally stopped on his own and walked away. Tamara was taken by ambulance to North Central Baptist Hospital. The investigation of the assault is being conducted by the Bexar County Sheriff's Department. This incident should never have happened. I reported witnessed police brutality in January 1991. Everything was shockingly covered up and since January 1991, I have been under SAPD sanctioned mobbing retaliation. After 9-11, my name was deliberately placed on the 'terror watch list', a cover for SAPD to operate, out-of-control, terroristic stalking and mobbing activities to harm me and to isolate me from anyone who might help me stop the victimization. I am SAPD's 'Poster Victim' on what they can get away with. Here we are in 2007. From the few videos I have uploaded, anyone can see the severe abuse I'm under. Follow me whenever I leave the house and watch as I'm stalked and harassed and threatened wherever I go. My house is not safe either. Twice, my home has been broken into. The first time my pet bird was tortured and killed in his cage. The second time I was home and I was severely beaten and raped. I was told women do not have the right to become Drs. I was forced to open all my locked filing cabinets so my attacker could search them for my triple prescription pads which I told him were not kept in my house. I was threatened with a military hit if I said anything to anyone. I have gone to two physicians for physical problems from that rape. Those around me either avoid me so they won't become victimized or they join in the attack. Those who attack me are confident they can say and do anything to me without accountability. Does anyone not understand the danger 18 year old Tamara Vaughan is still in? Her attacker presumably lives in her neighborhood and he is free on bond. A gated community is obviously not a deterrent or protection from violent assault and racial hatred from individuals in law enforcement. Does anyone not understand that an outside independent task force, NOT the Bexar County Sheriff's Department, NOT any other law enforcement agency/individuals networked with SAPD, needs to investigate what happened to her. What do you think is going to happen to anyone who comes forward as a witness for her? Recall that in January, 2002, an employee of the Bexar County Sheriff's department, Tammy Johnson, came to my home and asked me a substantial number of questions. I now understand the questions were to determine my vulnerability as a targeted victim. She even loaned me a camcorder to record the ongoing abuse. When I told her of my first successful recording of the ongoing SAPD helicopter terroristic flyovers, she couldn't get to my home fast enough to view the recording. She acted shocked and said that she didn't think I was going to be able to record the helicopter and then she left with the camcorder - but a blank tape inside. I switched tapes, not trusting her after the way she acted. I called her later and asked to borrow the camcorder to transfer the tape to a videotape to take to the San Antonio Police Chief, not trusting Internal Affairs anymore. She refused. She came to my home one more time. She told me she had bad news. She stated to me "They are going to kill you". "They" representing the terroristic stalking/mobbing network. She told me I needed to write my will and to sign my house over to her so that my pets would not be harmed. I refused. I had already paid her $2000 in cash at my bank out of the $10,000 requested to stop the terroristic stalking. She left angry. Later she called. She requested again that I pay her $10,000. I refused. She asked me if I knew about the woman who had been killed by two rottweilers. I said yes. (For the reader's information, a couple, who owned two Neapolitan mastiffs, hated their neighbor, a single attractive college educated woman. They would encourage their large dogs to act aggressively towards their neighbor who they hated so much until one day the dogs attacked and killed their neighbor). Bexar County Sheriff's Dep't employee, Tammy Johnson, then said "That should have been you those rottweilers killed. You are so passive you deserve to die". What she knew but you the reader does not know is that I have scarring on part of my upper lip and under my chin where I was bitten in the face when I was a child by the neighbor's dog and I was terrified for years of dogs I did not know until I learned quite a bit about dog behavior. I am a strong advocate for owning a dog and adopting that dog from the city pound where personally I feel the irresponsible owners should be, not the pets they treated like trash. Since then there was a brief news article in the San Antonio Express News about her. On January 22, 2005, she was stopped @2:35am for driving 65mph in a 50mph zone. She was the second Bexar County Sheriff's deputy charged with a DWI for that month. The officer who stopped her also noted a smell from the car raising his suspicion of the use of an illicit drug. Her supervisor in the Bexar County Sheriff's Department was at that time Amadeo Ortiz, the brother of then SAPD Police Chief Albert Ortiz. The Bexar County Sheriff is Ralph Lopez. He was with SAPD for 34 years before retiring and becoming Bexar County Sheriff. In an San Antonio Express News article August 3, 2007, author Ken Rodriguez stated that Detective Keith "Alfaro proclaims his innocence" and quoted another officer as saying "He felt his safety and the safety of his family was threatened." Law enforcement has all the needed answers and resources to cover up what happened. __________________________________________ 'Cops to screen city candidates' San Antonio Express News article February 22, 2003 The article said that "San Antonio's police union plans to spend months examining candidates running for office after the City Council rejected an agreement endorsed by the group's members." Rene Rodriguez, president of the San Antonio Police Officers Association, is quoted as saying "there were two choices - the right one or the wrong one. The majority of the City council, including the mayor, made the wrong one." This article is important. Clearly self serving police officer members of the union are going to use resources available to them to influence who will be elected to City Council. San Antonio Express News writer Rick Casey in a January 12, 2003 article asked "The police union's action committee is one of the largest contributors to the City Council. Will council members react in the light of the day as reasonable employers, or as paid agents?" I think additional questions to ask and investigate are: What information will they be gathering on City Council candidates and will there be any coercion or extortion measures enacted from union police officers to force City Council members to give them the $55 million contract they want which includes significant pay raises for the union police officers. ________________________________________ 'Cop faces jail time for groping nurses' San Antonio Express News article October 19, 2006 35 year old San Antonio Police Officer Randy Ramirez pleaded no contest to charges that while he was on duty he groped several nurses at Baptist Medical Center downtown. The incidents that were reported took place from February through May The article said he frequently stopped by the emergency room for coffee and to see a friend. According to the article the nurses said in police affidavits that they did not immediately report Ramirez to police because they feared retaliation. One of his victims told him she was going to report him and he replied "Who's going to believe you? I'm a cop." I think what is important is that the nurses were so afraid of retaliation. The questions should be what did they know that they were so afraid of retaliation, retaliation from whom... Have you noticed the recordings of terroristic stalkings of some of the Air Life Helicopters show the initials BHS on the underside of some of the recorded Air Life Helicopters. A San Antonio Express News article November 23, 2005 states that the "University Health System, which is a partner in AirLife with Baptist Health System..." ___________________________________ 'SAPD detective facing charges in Floresville' San Antonio Express News article September 13, 2005 39 year old San Antonio Police Detective James Joseph Montanio is a 12 year veteran of the San Antonio Police Department. At a McDonald's in Floresville, he asked a woman and her sisters to lift up their shirts anad then he grabbed his crotch. He yelled vulgar comments at them. He was arrested in Floresville on charges of public intoxication and disorderly conduct. He was released on bond and returned to duty at the San Antonio Police Department. ___________________________________ SAPD helicopter pilots are also SAPD police officers. The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in the clear blue sky heading West above a small greenbelt area behind my home. The helicopter caught my attention for several reasons: I don't recall seeing a helicopter in the almost twelve years that I had lived at my residence before this date; air space was under restrictions due to the terrorists' September 11, 2001 air attacks on the U.S.; and it was less than three weeks from the horrifying terrorists' attacks of 9-11. I watched from my backyard as the helicopter turned and began heading North and flew over the property parallel to mine and over my neighbor's home. I looked and kept looking for any identifying letters and/or numbers on the aircraft's visible side and tail section but I didn't see any. I observed the helicopter as it flew over and past my neighbor's property, gaining altitude and heading slightly Northwest over the subdivision I live in. Abruptly, the helicopter turned around and was directed in a dive bomb descent over the roof of my home at me in my backyard. I went as far back as I could to the back corner of my fence and was trapped there at my locked six foot backyard gate that gives access to the greenbelt area behind my backyard. I'm grateful for the trees in the greenbelt area protectively backing up to my backyard and the power lines above my back fence. They restricted how low the helicopter could get. The helicopter HOVERED JUST ABOVE the power lines overhead. I read the word POLICE in bold letters on the underside of the helicopter. Then the helicopter after a long hovering, turned in place and headed North again. I ran to my house and grabbed my camera but the helicopter was by then out of sight. I called the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and spoke with Sergeant Moseley (spelling?) from Internal Affairs. He placed me on hold while he called and spoke with the SAPD Helicopter Division and relayed to me that he was told no SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time I gave him for the helicopter incident. I questioned him. Then where did the helicopter come from? Wasn't anyone concerned over what had just happened? In reply, he gave me the SAPD Helicopter Division phone number to call and talk to someone there which I did. I called the SAPD Helicopter Division and spoke with Sergeant Torres who identified himself as the SAPD supervising staff member of the SAPD Helicopter Division. I could not understand why Sergeant Torres was not concerned about what had happened, especially a helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, especially considering the heightened state of alert since 9-11 and concern that there could be more air attacks by terrorists. As I spoke with Sergeant Torres, he repeated some of what I said over the phone to an audience he had at his location. I could hear them laughing. They were laughing at me, laughing at my distress, laughing at my fear for the safety of others who could become targets of the unidentified helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside that had just terrorized me in my backyard. Why were they laughing? Why didn't they think that what I told them was alarming? I kept questioning Sergeant Torres until he finally 'confessed' that, YES, an SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time given. He said they were looking for an abandoned vehicle. In my small fenced-in back yard? He said 'they' didn't see me. An OUTRAGEOUS LIE. Anyone who's flown in a plane and looked out the window, while it was daylight, during a take-off and/or landing, is aware of how well 'they' in the helicopter did see me as 'they' were flying just a few feet above the height of typical streetside power lines. I told Sergeant Torres that what 'they' did was terrifying, my heart was pounding when it happened, that it was not funny, and that I could have had a heart attack (family history of heart attacks and strokes), and that what 'they' did was irresponsible. Sergeant Torres' reply was a threatening tirade on how I needed to be supportive of law enforcement and the officers who risked their lives to protect life and property. Sergeant Torres covered up one serious wrongdoing with another serious wrongdoing - badgering me, the victim. There is no doubt in my mind that what the helicopter pilots did was deliberate and self serving in the same way as those who commit acts of violence against children, women, and pets. Sergeant Torres then retracted his 'confession' that I had obtained from him through careful questioning. He told me that the helicopter I saw was not SAPD's but was probably from one of the area cities' police departments. He said SAPD helicopters were royal blue with metal flaking and a gold stripe . I had described the helicopter as turquoise with a white diagonal stripe. Under my additional questioning, he did say that YES the word POLICE was on the underside of the SAPD helicopter. It should be clear to everyone that something is seriously wrong with SAPD if SAPD was not involved. Why wasn't the SAPD Helicopter Division concerned about the actions of that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter, especially since according to the information from Sergeant Torres, the helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, besides being piloted in what I considered a terroristic action, was also out of its area of jurisdiction??? I called several of the area cities' police departments to identify the city police department responsible for that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter. I received the same answer from all of them: The SAPD Helicopter Division handles the helicopter services for all San Antonio area cities' police departments and also for the Sheriff's Department. That alone should be sufficient proof that Sergeant Torres had told me another OUTRAGEOUS LIE but there was still the problem with the discrepancy in the color of the helicopter. I called area airports. Once they learned SAPD denied involvement, they referred me elsewhere (out of fear of personal involvement?). I called the City of San Antonio Aviation Department Noise Abatement Office @ 210-207-3471 and spoke with Jerry Brinken who identified the helicopter as SAPD regardless of the color discrepancy. He said he could only write up the helicopter incident as a noise complaint and allegedly did so. I called a number given to me as the San Antonio District Office Flight Service Station where flight plans are filed @ 1-800-WXBRIEF (992-7433). I spoke with someone with a name sounding like Woodren (spelling?) who said he could only give me information if I had a call number. I called FAA San Antonio Flight Standards District office @ 210-308-3300. I spoke with 'Gracie' who referred me to 'Gary' who asked me to call him back at 3 p.m. at which time he told me he was waiting on information from Linn Scott (spelling?) and to call him back again at 3:30 p.m. which I did. Gary told me he gave the information on the helicopter incident to the International San Antonio Airport and there was no identification for that kind of helicopter with police written on the underside and no call numbers. There was no consideration given for a helicopter with call numbers that were not easily visible/readable. By calling in a complaint and trying to identify the two San Antonio police officers/pilots responsible for the September 27, 2001 incident, I was targeted for severe and extreme mobbing by air in addition to ground mobbing. The San Antonio Police Department remains unaccountable for its act of air terrorism on a woman alone in her backyard less than three weeks after 9-11. The San Antonio Police Department is frighteningly out of control by the activities it has engaged in to cover up for its police officers wrongdoings. The San Antonio Police Department continues to abuse and misuse resources available to it after initiating and continuing to date a very public terroristic mobbing targeting me as a victim involving collusion of governmental agencies at the local, state, and federal levels and nongovernmental agencies. The terroristic stalking by air, using helicopters, that I have videotaped and identified ownership of, have involved helicopters owned by the Military, the Department of Public Safety, EMS agencies, media agencies, and U.S. Customs as well as ongoing terroristic stalking by helicopters owned by the San Antonio Police Department. For over five years, I have videotaped aircraft, involved in stalking me, flying over my home, my backyard, my FORMER office that I had no choice but to close, over me when I'm driving, in parking lots of shopping centers... I have videotaped fuel dumping over my back yard, terroristic circling, nose dive flying at and over me, and disabling deliberate migraine triggering aircraft sounds. In January, 2002, an employee of the Bexar County Sheriff''s department, Tammy Johnson, came to my home and asked me a substantial number of questions. I now understand the questions were to determine my vulnerability as a targeted victim. She even loaned me a camcorder to record the ongoing abuse. When I told her of my first successful recording of the ongoing SAPD helicopter terroristic flyovers, she couldn't get to my home fast enough to view the recording. She acted shocked and said that she didn't think I was going to be able to record the helicopter and then she left with the camcorder - but a blank tape inside. I switched tapes, not trusting her after the way she acted. I called her later and asked to borrow the camcorder to transfer the tape to a videotape to take to the San Antonio Police Chief, not trusting Internal Affairs anymore. She refused. She came to my home one more time. She told me she had bad news. She stated to me "They are going to kill you". "They" representing the terroristic stalking/mobbing network. She told me I needed to write my will and to sign my home over to her so that my pets would not be harmed. I refused. I had already paid her $2000 in cash at my bank out of the $10,000 requested to stop the terroristic stalking. She left angry. Later she called. She asked me if I knew about the woman who had been killed by two rottweilers. I said yes. (For the reader's information, a couple, who owned two Neapolitan mastiffs, hated their neighbor, a single attractive college educated woman. They would encourage their large dogs to act aggressively towards their neighbor who they hated so much until one day the dogs attacked and killed their neighbor). Bexar County Sheriff's Dep't employee, Tammy Johnson, then said "That should have been you those rottweilers killed. You are so passive you deserve to die". What she knew but you the reader does not know is that I have scarring on part of my upper lip and under my chin where I was bitten in the face when I was a child by the neighbor's dog and I was terrified for years of dogs I did not know until I learned quite a bit about dog behavior. I am a strong advocate for owning a dog and adopting that dog from the city pound where personally I feel the irresponsible owners should be, not the pets they treated like trash. Since then there was a brief news article in the San Antonio Express News about her. She had been the subject of a traffic stop and the officer who stopped her noted a smell from the car raising his suspicion of the use of an illicit drug. Of course she still wears the Bexar County Sheriff's Department uniform and service gun. Law enforcement is a family above the law and covers for its own. I need to add some more videos then I will tell you who I contacted for help... Obviously no one has yet been held accountable for the terroristic stalkings. I'm still videotaping and the stalkers are freaking out because I found youtube and while they may have been able to control covering up what they have done in San Antonio and Texas, anyone outside their retaliation range can speak out against what they are doing and get the legislation passed to stop this in my state and your state and our democratic nation. Please read what happened to Dr. Ramona Miller in the state of Missouri (web link below). http://www.abuseofpower.info/Wetendorf.htm http://hometown.aol.com/wbflegal/page12.html http://sites.securemc.com/folder13712/index.cfm?id=9323&fuse action=browse&pageid=1 Ongoing Terroristic Stalking of assault and battery and rape victim Violence Against Women Violence against a health care professional Baptist Hospital nurses vs SAPD Official Oppression Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Violence Against Women Hate Crime OTHER... After 9-11, there was a television commercial paid for by the government. Terrorism was defined as threats, harassment, assault, and intimidation. The goal of terrorism was defined as to defeat your way of life. The commercial advised viewers to defeat terrorism. Terroristic Stalkers Character Profile: http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/abuse_connection.php Terroristic Stalkers: Established Goals: http://www.ncdsv.org/images/PowerControlwheelNOSHADING.pdf http://www.ncdsv.org/images/Police- perpetrateddomviolNOSHADING.pdf http://www.ncdsv.org/images/MilitarycontrolwheelNOSHADING.pd f The rarer the target victim, the more likely that victim will be tortured. Doctor victims are prize targets because they are rarely accessible to harm. Look at what was done to Dr. Ramona Miller and Dr. Philip Shue. Destroying the value of a Doctor's education, training and skills gives the abusers heightened enjoyment and power fulfillment. (more) (less) Tags: Bad Cops civil rights Terrorism Stalking Victim Violence Against Women Aggie Dr.RamonaMiller Dr.PhilipShue ACLU (more) (less) Tags: Bad Cops civil rights Terrorism Stalking Victim Violence Against Women Aggie Dr.RamonaMiller Dr.PhilipShue ACLU (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: ACLU Against Aggie Bad civil Cops Dr.PhilipShue Dr.RamonaMiller rights Stalking Terrorism Victim Violence Women
Rate it: Rate:
33, 05:26, 2008-04-21 16:16:09 Description: Youtube limits video to 100 MB. This video is MB out of MB and represents the first part out of two for 9-4-02 The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using (More) Youtube limits video to 100 MB. This video is MB out of MB and represents the first part out of two for 9-4-02 The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in the clear blue sky heading West above a small greenbelt area behind my home. The helicopter caught my attention for several reasons: I don't recall seeing a helicopter in the almost twelve years that I had lived at my residence before this date; air space was under restrictions due to the terrorists' September 11, 2001 air attacks on the U.S.; and it was less than three weeks from the horrifying terrorists' attacks of 9-11. I watched from my backyard as the helicopter turned and began heading North and flew over the property parallel to mine and over my neighbor's home. I looked and kept looking for any identifying letters and/or numbers on the aircraft's visible side and tail section but I didn't see any. I observed the helicopter as it flew over and past my neighbor's property, gaining altitude and heading slightly Northwest over the subdivision I live in. Abruptly, the helicopter turned around and was directed in a dive bomb descent over the roof of my home at me in my backyard. I went as far back as I could to the back corner of my fence and was trapped there at my locked six foot backyard gate that gives access to the greenbelt area behind my backyard. I'm grateful for the trees in the greenbelt area protectively backing up to my backyard and the power lines above my back fence. They restricted how low the helicopter could get. The helicopter HOVERED JUST ABOVE the power lines overhead. I read the word POLICE in bold letters on the underside of the helicopter. Then the helicopter after a long hovering, turned in place and headed North again. I ran to my house and grabbed my camera but the helicopter was by then out of sight. I called the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and spoke with Sergeant Moseley (spelling?) from Internal Affairs. He placed me on hold while he called and spoke with the SAPD Helicopter Division and relayed to me that he was told no SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time I gave him for the helicopter incident. I questioned him. Then where did the helicopter come from? Wasn't anyone concerned over what had just happened? In reply, he gave me the SAPD Helicopter Division phone number to call and talk to someone there which I did. I called the SAPD Helicopter Division and spoke with Sergeant Torres who identified himself as the SAPD supervising staff member of the SAPD Helicopter Division. I could not understand why Sergeant Torres was not concerned about what had happened, especially a helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, especially considering the heightened state of alert since 9-11 and concern that there could be more air attacks by terrorists. As I spoke with Sergeant Torres, he repeated some of what I said over the phone to an audience he had at his location. I could hear them laughing. They were laughing at me, laughing at my distress, laughing at my fear for the safety of others who could become targets of the unidentified helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside that had just terrorized me in my backyard. Why were they laughing? Why didn't they think that what I told them was alarming? I kept questioning Sergeant Torres until he finally 'confessed' that, YES, an SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time given. He said they were looking for an abandoned vehicle. In my small fenced-in back yard? He said 'they' didn't see me. An OUTRAGEOUS LIE. Anyone who's flown in a plane and looked out the window, while it was daylight, during a take-off and/or landing, is aware of how well 'they' in the helicopter did see me as 'they' were flying just a few feet above the height of typical streetside power lines. I told Sergeant Torres that what 'they' did was terrifying, my heart was pounding when it happened, that it was not funny, and that I could have had a heart attack (family history of heart attacks and strokes), and that what 'they' did was irresponsible. Sergeant Torres' reply was a threatening tirade on how I needed to be supportive of law enforcement and the officers who risked their lives to protect life and property. Sergeant Torres covered up one serious wrongdoing with another serious wrongdoing - badgering me, the victim. There is no doubt in my mind that what the helicopter pilots did was deliberate and self serving in the same way as those who commit acts of violence against children, women, and pets. Sergeant Torres then retracted his 'confession' that I had obtained from him through careful questioning. He told me that the helicopter I saw was not SAPD's but was probably from one of the area cities' police departments. He said SAPD helicopters were royal blue with metal flaking and a gold stripe . I had described the helicopter as turquoise with a white diagonal stripe. Under my additional questioning, he did say that YES the word POLICE was on the underside of the SAPD helicopter. It should be clear to everyone that something is seriously wrong with SAPD if SAPD was not involved. Why wasn't the SAPD Helicopter Division concerned about the actions of that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter, especially since according to the information from Sergeant Torres, the helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, besides being piloted in what I considered a terroristic action, was also out of its area of jurisdiction??? I called several of the area cities' police departments to identify the city police department responsible for that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter. I received the same answer from all of them: The SAPD Helicopter Division handles the helicopter services for all San Antonio area cities' police departments and also for the Sheriff's Department. That alone should be sufficient proof that Sergeant Torres had told me another OUTRAGEOUS LIE but there was still the problem with the discrepancy in the color of the helicopter. I called area airports. Once they learned SAPD denied involvement, they referred me elsewhere (out of fear of personal involvement?). I called the City of San Antonio Aviation Department Noise Abatement Office @ 210-207-3471 and spoke with Jerry Brinken who identified the helicopter as SAPD regardless of the color discrepancy. He said he could only write up the helicopter incident as a noise complaint and allegedly did so. I called a number given to me as the San Antonio District Office Flight Service Station where flight plans are filed @ 1-800-WXBRIEF (992-7433). I spoke with someone with a name sounding like Woodren (spelling?) who said he could only give me information if I had a call number. I called FAA San Antonio Flight Standards District office @ 210-308-3300. I spoke with 'Gracie' who referred me to 'Gary' who asked me to call him back at 3 p.m. at which time he told me he was waiting on information from Linn Scott (spelling?) and to call him back again at 3:30 p.m. which I did. Gary told me he gave the information on the helicopter incident to the International San Antonio Airport and there was no identification for that kind of helicopter with police written on the underside and no call numbers. There was no consideration given for a helicopter with call numbers that were not easily visible/readable. By calling in a complaint and trying to identify the two San Antonio police officers/pilots responsible for the September 27, 2001 incident, I was targeted for severe and extreme mobbing by air in addition to ground mobbing. The San Antonio Police Department remains unaccountable for its act of air terrorism on a woman alone in her backyard less than three weeks after 9-11. The San Antonio Police Department is frighteningly out of control by the activities it has engaged in to cover up for its police officers wrongdoings. The San Antonio Police Department continues to abuse and misuse resources available to it after initiating and continuing to date a very public terroristic mobbing targeting me as a victim involving collusion of governmental agencies at the local, state, and federal levels and nongovernmental agencies. The terroristic stalking by air, using helicopters, that I have videotaped and identified ownership of, have involved helicopters owned by the Military, the Department of Public Safety, EMS agencies, media agencies, and U.S. Customs as well as ongoing terroristic stalking by helicopters owned by the San Antonio Police Department. For over five years, I have videotaped aircraft, involved in stalking me, flying over my home, my backyard, my FORMER office that I had no choice but to close, over me when I'm driving, in parking lots of shopping centers... I have videotaped fuel dumping over my back yard, terroristic circling, nose dive flying at and over me, and disabling deliberate migraine triggering aircraft sounds. In January, 2002, an employee of the Bexar County Sheriff''s department, Tammy Johnson, came to my home and asked me a substantial number of questions. I now understand the questions were to determine my vulnerability as a targeted victim. She even loaned me a camcorder to record the ongoing abuse. When I told her of my first successful recording of the ongoing SAPD helicopter terroristic flyovers, she couldn't get to my home fast enough to view the recording. She acted shocked and said that she didn't think I was going to be able to record the helicopter and then she left with the camcorder - but a blank tape inside. I switched tapes, not trusting her after the way she acted. I called her later and asked to borrow the camcorder to transfer the tape to a videotape to take to the San Antonio Police Chief, not trusting Internal Affairs anymore. She refused. She came to my home one more time. She told me she had bad news. She stated to me "They are going to kill you". "They" representing the terroristic stalking/mobbing network. She told me I needed to write my will and to sign my home over to her so that my pets would not be harmed. I refused. I had already paid her $2000 in cash at my bank out of the $10,000 requested to stop the terroristic stalking. She left angry. Later she called. She asked me if I knew about the woman who had been killed by two rottweilers. I said yes. (For the reader's information, a couple, who owned two Neapolitan mastiffs, hated their neighbor, a single attractive college educated woman. They would encourage their large dogs to act aggressively towards their neighbor who they hated so much until one day the dogs attacked and killed their neighbor). Bexar County Sheriff's Dep't employee, Tammy Johnson, then said "That should have been you those rottweilers killed. You are so passive you deserve to die". What she knew but you the reader does not know is that I have scarring on part of my upper lip and under my chin where I was bitten in the face when I was a child by the neighbor's dog and I was terrified for years of dogs I did not know until I learned quite a bit about dog behavior. I am a strong advocate for owning a dog and adopting that dog from the city pound where personally I feel the irresponsible owners should be, not the pets they treated like trash. Since then there was a brief news article in the San Antonio Express News about her. She had been the subject of a traffic stop and the officer who stopped her noted a smell from the car raising his suspicion of the use of an illicit drug. Of course she still wears the Bexar County Sheriff's Department uniform and service gun. Law enforcement is a family above the law and covers for its own. I need to add some more videos then I will tell you who I contacted for help... Obviously no one has yet been held accountable for the terroristic stalkings. I'm still videotaping and the stalkers are freaking out because I found youtube and while they may have been able to control covering up what they have done in San Antonio and Texas, anyone outside their retaliation range can speak out against what they are doing and get the legislation passed to stop this in my state and your state and our democratic nation. Please read what happened to Dr. Ramona Miller in the state of Missouri (web link below). http://www.abuseofpower.info/Wetendorf.htm http://hometown.aol.com/wbflegal/page12.html http://sites.securemc.com/folder13712/index.cfm?id=9323&fuseaction=browse&pageid=1 Ongoing Terroristic Stalking of assault and battery and rape victim Violence Against Women Violence against a health care professional Baptist Hospital nurses vs SAPD Official Oppression Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Violence Against Women Hate Crime OTHER... For over five years, since 2002, military planes have been flying over my home, over and over and over again. There have been days when I have counted over 55 flights, all of them using the same flight pathway overhead, at all hours of the day and night, causing severe stress and sleep deprivation. There is documentation readily available on the Internet discussing the effects on individuals and the community from abusive plane sounds. That same documentation also discusses flight activities that increase the abuse level of the sound effects experienced by those on the ground below. FAA, pilot organizations, the Jeppesen pilot textbook, all have written about minimizing the impact of abusive aircraft sounds on the community. I can only conclude that abusive aircraft overhead are piloted by individuals operating their aircraft deliberately and terroristically to harm those below their abusive flight path. The 'screaming' aircraft overhead have repeatedly demonstrated that they can fly substantially quieter. Fighter Jet pilots have been so severely abusive on many of their flights overhead, their sound waves caused structural vibration so severe, it felt like my home was exploding around me. The physiological vibration has been so severe, it leaves you stunned. It is a concussion shock. The documentation is readily available on heart attacks triggered by abusive fighter jets overhead. The abusive sounds deliberately set off by the planes are so severe they forcefully induce rarely ending severe headaches that easily become incapacitating migraines that last for days sustained by the ongoing repeat flights of severely abusive migraine triggering flights overhead. You can't think with a migraine. The pain is too overwhelming. If someone twisted those pilots' balls every time they abused and misused their control over their plane's severe sound output, they might feel some of the pain they are causing. Your brain is struggling through sludge trying to think under the effects of the forcefully induced severe headache from the military planes. My home is NOT located near any airport or Air Force base that could explain the seriously destructive level of sound output from those planes. Three of my neighbors under the age of 45 are dead. One of those neighbors was a young recently widowed mother of two young children under the age of twelve. Her husband had tragically died in an accident before she moved into the house just a few houses from mine with her two young children who now face life without a father and a mother. About half the neighbors on my street have moved/sold their homes. A new neighbor calls the severely abusive aircraft flying over our homes 'screamers'. She had an 'unexplained' miscarriage at six months. I have been severely affected, many times incapacitated by migraines forcefully induced by the 'screaming' aircraft overhead and struggling with the forcefully induced severe headaches the remainder of the time. Tags: Dr. Philip Shue Military Psyops Military & Law Enforcement Use of Sound for Weapons Military Research On Aircraft Sound Effects On People, Pets, Environment and structural damage. http://www.nonoise.org/library/ane/an... http://www.aopa.org/pilot/features/20... http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/h... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_we... (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: ACLU Against Aggie Bad civil Cops Dr.Philip Dr.RamonaMiller rights Shue Stalking Terrorism Victim Violence Women
Rate it: Rate:
22, 03:43, 2008-04-21 16:16:09 Description: Youtube limits video to 100 MB. This video is MB out of MB and represents the second part out of two for 9-4-02 The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using (More) Youtube limits video to 100 MB. This video is MB out of MB and represents the second part out of two for 9-4-02 The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in the clear blue sky heading West above a small greenbelt area behind my home. The helicopter caught my attention for several reasons: I don't recall seeing a helicopter in the almost twelve years that I had lived at my residence before this date; air space was under restrictions due to the terrorists' September 11, 2001 air attacks on the U.S.; and it was less than three weeks from the horrifying terrorists' attacks of 9-11. I watched from my backyard as the helicopter turned and began heading North and flew over the property parallel to mine and over my neighbor's home. I looked and kept looking for any identifying letters and/or numbers on the aircraft's visible side and tail section but I didn't see any. I observed the helicopter as it flew over and past my neighbor's property, gaining altitude and heading slightly Northwest over the subdivision I live in. Abruptly, the helicopter turned around and was directed in a dive bomb descent over the roof of my home at me in my backyard. I went as far back as I could to the back corner of my fence and was trapped there at my locked six foot backyard gate that gives access to the greenbelt area behind my backyard. I'm grateful for the trees in the greenbelt area protectively backing up to my backyard and the power lines above my back fence. They restricted how low the helicopter could get. The helicopter HOVERED JUST ABOVE the power lines overhead. I read the word POLICE in bold letters on the underside of the helicopter. Then the helicopter after a long hovering, turned in place and headed North again. I ran to my house and grabbed my camera but the helicopter was by then out of sight. I called the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and spoke with Sergeant Moseley (spelling?) from Internal Affairs. He placed me on hold while he called and spoke with the SAPD Helicopter Division and relayed to me that he was told no SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time I gave him for the helicopter incident. I questioned him. Then where did the helicopter come from? Wasn't anyone concerned over what had just happened? In reply, he gave me the SAPD Helicopter Division phone number to call and talk to someone there which I did. I called the SAPD Helicopter Division and spoke with Sergeant Torres who identified himself as the SAPD supervising staff member of the SAPD Helicopter Division. I could not understand why Sergeant Torres was not concerned about what had happened, especially a helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, especially considering the heightened state of alert since 9-11 and concern that there could be more air attacks by terrorists. As I spoke with Sergeant Torres, he repeated some of what I said over the phone to an audience he had at his location. I could hear them laughing. They were laughing at me, laughing at my distress, laughing at my fear for the safety of others who could become targets of the unidentified helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside that had just terrorized me in my backyard. Why were they laughing? Why didn't they think that what I told them was alarming? I kept questioning Sergeant Torres until he finally 'confessed' that, YES, an SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time given. He said they were looking for an abandoned vehicle. In my small fenced-in back yard? He said 'they' didn't see me. An OUTRAGEOUS LIE. Anyone who's flown in a plane and looked out the window, while it was daylight, during a take-off and/or landing, is aware of how well 'they' in the helicopter did see me as 'they' were flying just a few feet above the height of typical streetside power lines. I told Sergeant Torres that what 'they' did was terrifying, my heart was pounding when it happened, that it was not funny, and that I could have had a heart attack (family history of heart attacks and strokes), and that what 'they' did was irresponsible. Sergeant Torres' reply was a threatening tirade on how I needed to be supportive of law enforcement and the officers who risked their lives to protect life and property. Sergeant Torres covered up one serious wrongdoing with another serious wrongdoing - badgering me, the victim. There is no doubt in my mind that what the helicopter pilots did was deliberate and self serving in the same way as those who commit acts of violence against children, women, and pets. Sergeant Torres then retracted his 'confession' that I had obtained from him through careful questioning. He told me that the helicopter I saw was not SAPD's but was probably from one of the area cities' police departments. He said SAPD helicopters were royal blue with metal flaking and a gold stripe . I had described the helicopter as turquoise with a white diagonal stripe. Under my additional questioning, he did say that YES the word POLICE was on the underside of the SAPD helicopter. It should be clear to everyone that something is seriously wrong with SAPD if SAPD was not involved. Why wasn't the SAPD Helicopter Division concerned about the actions of that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter, especially since according to the information from Sergeant Torres, the helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, besides being piloted in what I considered a terroristic action, was also out of its area of jurisdiction??? I called several of the area cities' police departments to identify the city police department responsible for that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter. I received the same answer from all of them: The SAPD Helicopter Division handles the helicopter services for all San Antonio area cities' police departments and also for the Sheriff's Department. That alone should be sufficient proof that Sergeant Torres had told me another OUTRAGEOUS LIE but there was still the problem with the discrepancy in the color of the helicopter. I called area airports. Once they learned SAPD denied involvement, they referred me elsewhere (out of fear of personal involvement?). I called the City of San Antonio Aviation Department Noise Abatement Office @ 210-207-3471 and spoke with Jerry Brinken who identified the helicopter as SAPD regardless of the color discrepancy. He said he could only write up the helicopter incident as a noise complaint and allegedly did so. I called a number given to me as the San Antonio District Office Flight Service Station where flight plans are filed @ 1-800-WXBRIEF (992-7433). I spoke with someone with a name sounding like Woodren (spelling?) who said he could only give me information if I had a call number. I called FAA San Antonio Flight Standards District office @ 210-308-3300. I spoke with 'Gracie' who referred me to 'Gary' who asked me to call him back at 3 p.m. at which time he told me he was waiting on information from Linn Scott (spelling?) and to call him back again at 3:30 p.m. which I did. Gary told me he gave the information on the helicopter incident to the International San Antonio Airport and there was no identification for that kind of helicopter with police written on the underside and no call numbers. There was no consideration given for a helicopter with call numbers that were not easily visible/readable. By calling in a complaint and trying to identify the two San Antonio police officers/pilots responsible for the September 27, 2001 incident, I was targeted for severe and extreme mobbing by air in addition to ground mobbing. The San Antonio Police Department remains unaccountable for its act of air terrorism on a woman alone in her backyard less than three weeks after 9-11. The San Antonio Police Department is frighteningly out of control by the activities it has engaged in to cover up for its police officers wrongdoings. The San Antonio Police Department continues to abuse and misuse resources available to it after initiating and continuing to date a very public terroristic mobbing targeting me as a victim involving collusion of governmental agencies at the local, state, and federal levels and nongovernmental agencies. The terroristic stalking by air, using helicopters, that I have videotaped and identified ownership of, have involved helicopters owned by the Military, the Department of Public Safety, EMS agencies, media agencies, and U.S. Customs as well as ongoing terroristic stalking by helicopters owned by the San Antonio Police Department. For over five years, I have videotaped aircraft, involved in stalking me, flying over my home, my backyard, my FORMER office that I had no choice but to close, over me when I'm driving, in parking lots of shopping centers... I have videotaped fuel dumping over my back yard, terroristic circling, nose dive flying at and over me, and disabling deliberate migraine triggering aircraft sounds. In January, 2002, an employee of the Bexar County Sheriff''s department, Tammy Johnson, came to my home and asked me a substantial number of questions. I now understand the questions were to determine my vulnerability as a targeted victim. She even loaned me a camcorder to record the ongoing abuse. When I told her of my first successful recording of the ongoing SAPD helicopter terroristic flyovers, she couldn't get to my home fast enough to view the recording. She acted shocked and said that she didn't think I was going to be able to record the helicopter and then she left with the camcorder - but a blank tape inside. I switched tapes, not trusting her after the way she acted. I called her later and asked to borrow the camcorder to transfer the tape to a videotape to take to the San Antonio Police Chief, not trusting Internal Affairs anymore. She refused. She came to my home one more time. She told me she had bad news. She stated to me "They are going to kill you". "They" representing the terroristic stalking/mobbing network. She told me I needed to write my will and to sign my home over to her so that my pets would not be harmed. I refused. I had already paid her $2000 in cash at my bank out of the $10,000 requested to stop the terroristic stalking. She left angry. Later she called. She asked me if I knew about the woman who had been killed by two rottweilers. I said yes. (For the reader's information, a couple, who owned two Neapolitan mastiffs, hated their neighbor, a single attractive college educated woman. They would encourage their large dogs to act aggressively towards their neighbor who they hated so much until one day the dogs attacked and killed their neighbor). Bexar County Sheriff's Dep't employee, Tammy Johnson, then said "That should have been you those rottweilers killed. You are so passive you deserve to die". What she knew but you the reader does not know is that I have scarring on part of my upper lip and under my chin where I was bitten in the face when I was a child by the neighbor's dog and I was terrified for years of dogs I did not know until I learned quite a bit about dog behavior. I am a strong advocate for owning a dog and adopting that dog from the city pound where personally I feel the irresponsible owners should be, not the pets they treated like trash. Since then there was a brief news article in the San Antonio Express News about her. She had been the subject of a traffic stop and the officer who stopped her noted a smell from the car raising his suspicion of the use of an illicit drug. Of course she still wears the Bexar County Sheriff's Department uniform and service gun. Law enforcement is a family above the law and covers for its own. I need to add some more videos then I will tell you who I contacted for help... Obviously no one has yet been held accountable for the terroristic stalkings. I'm still videotaping and the stalkers are freaking out because I found youtube and while they may have been able to control covering up what they have done in San Antonio and Texas, anyone outside their retaliation range can speak out against what they are doing and get the legislation passed to stop this in my state and your state and our democratic nation. Please read what happened to Dr. Ramona Miller in the state of Missouri (web link below). http://www.abuseofpower.info/Wetendorf.htm http://hometown.aol.com/wbflegal/page12.html http://sites.securemc.com/folder13712/index.cfm?id=9323&fuseaction=browse&pageid=1 Ongoing Terroristic Stalking of assault and battery and rape victim Violence Against Women Violence against a health care professional Baptist Hospital nurses vs SAPD Official Oppression Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Violence Against Women Hate Crime OTHER... For over five years, since 2002, military planes have been flying over my home, over and over and over again. There have been days when I have counted over 55 flights, all of them using the same flight pathway overhead, at all hours of the day and night, causing severe stress and sleep deprivation. There is documentation readily available on the Internet discussing the effects on individuals and the community from abusive plane sounds. That same documentation also discusses flight activities that increase the abuse level of the sound effects experienced by those on the ground below. FAA, pilot organizations, the Jeppesen pilot textbook, all have written about minimizing the impact of abusive aircraft sounds on the community. I can only conclude that abusive aircraft overhead are piloted by individuals operating their aircraft deliberately and terroristically to harm those below their abusive flight path. The 'screaming' aircraft overhead have repeatedly demonstrated that they can fly substantially quieter. Fighter Jet pilots have been so severely abusive on many of their flights overhead, their sound waves caused structural vibration so severe, it felt like my home was exploding around me. The physiological vibration has been so severe, it leaves you stunned. It is a concussion shock. The documentation is readily available on heart attacks triggered by abusive fighter jets overhead. The abusive sounds deliberately set off by the planes are so severe they forcefully induce rarely ending severe headaches that easily become incapacitating migraines that last for days sustained by the ongoing repeat flights of severely abusive migraine triggering flights overhead. You can't think with a migraine. The pain is too overwhelming. If someone twisted those pilots' balls every time they abused and misused their control over their plane's severe sound output, they might feel some of the pain they are causing. Your brain is struggling through sludge trying to think under the effects of the forcefully induced severe headache from the military planes. My home is NOT located near any airport or Air Force base that could explain the seriously destructive level of sound output from those planes. Three of my neighbors under the age of 45 are dead. One of those neighbors was a young recently widowed mother of two young children under the age of twelve. Her husband had tragically died in an accident before she moved into the house just a few houses from mine with her two young children who now face life without a father and a mother. About half the neighbors on my street have moved/sold their homes. A new neighbor calls the severely abusive aircraft flying over our homes 'screamers'. She had an 'unexplained' miscarriage at six months. I have been severely affected, many times incapacitated by migraines forcefully induced by the 'screaming' aircraft overhead and struggling with the forcefully induced severe headaches the remainder of the time. Tags: Dr. Philip Shue Military Psyops Military & Law Enforcement Use of Sound for Weapons Military Research On Aircraft Sound Effects On People, Pets, Environment and structural damage. http://www.nonoise.org/library/ane/an... http://www.aopa.org/pilot/features/20... http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/h... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonic_we... (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: ACLU Against Aggie Bad civil Cops Dr.Philip Dr.RamonaMiller rights Shue Stalking Terrorism Victim Violence Women
Rate it: Rate:
18, 01:15, 2008-04-21 16:30:21 Description: The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in (More) The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in the clear blue sky heading West above a small greenbelt area behind my home. The helicopter caught my attention for several reasons: I don't recall seeing a helicopter in the almost twelve years that I had lived at my residence before this date; air space was under restrictions due to the terrorists' September 11, 2001 air attacks on the U.S.; and it was less than three weeks from the horrifying terrorists' attacks of 9-11. I watched from my backyard as the helicopter turned and began heading North and flew over the property parallel to mine and over my neighbor's home. I looked and kept looking for any identifying letters and/or numbers on the aircraft's visible side and tail section but I didn't see any. I observed the helicopter as it flew over and past my neighbor's property, gaining altitude and heading slightly Northwest over the subdivision I live in. Abruptly, the helicopter turned around and was directed in a dive bomb descent over the roof of my home at me in my backyard. I went as far back as I could to the back corner of my fence and was trapped there at my locked six foot backyard gate that gives access to the greenbelt area behind my backyard. I'm grateful for the trees in the greenbelt area protectively backing up to my backyard and the power lines above my back fence. They restricted how low the helicopter could get. The helicopter HOVERED JUST ABOVE the power lines overhead. I read the word POLICE in bold letters on the underside of the helicopter. Then the helicopter after a long hovering, turned in place and headed North again. I ran to my house and grabbed my camera but the helicopter was by then out of sight. I called the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and spoke with Sergeant Moseley (spelling?) from Internal Affairs. He placed me on hold while he called and spoke with the SAPD Helicopter Division and relayed to me that he was told no SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time I gave him for the helicopter incident. I questioned him. Then where did the helicopter come from? Wasn't anyone concerned over what had just happened? In reply, he gave me the SAPD Helicopter Division phone number to call and talk to someone there which I did. I called the SAPD Helicopter Division and spoke with Sergeant Torres who identified himself as the SAPD supervising staff member of the SAPD Helicopter Division. I could not understand why Sergeant Torres was not concerned about what had happened, especially a helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, especially considering the heightened state of alert since 9-11 and concern that there could be more air attacks by terrorists. As I spoke with Sergeant Torres, he repeated some of what I said over the phone to an audience he had at his location. I could hear them laughing. They were laughing at me, laughing at my distress, laughing at my fear for the safety of others who could become targets of the unidentified helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside that had just terrorized me in my backyard. Why were they laughing? Why didn't they think that what I told them was alarming? I kept questioning Sergeant Torres until he finally 'confessed' that, YES, an SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time given. He said they were looking for an abandoned vehicle. In my small fenced-in back yard? He said 'they' didn't see me. An OUTRAGEOUS LIE. Anyone who's flown in a plane and looked out the window, while it was daylight, during a take-off and/or landing, is aware of how well 'they' in the helicopter did see me as 'they' were flying just a few feet above the height of typical streetside power lines. I told Sergeant Torres that what 'they' did was terrifying, my heart was pounding when it happened, that it was not funny, and that I could have had a heart attack (family history of heart attacks and strokes), and that what 'they' did was irresponsible. Sergeant Torres' reply was a threatening tirade on how I needed to be supportive of law enforcement and the officers who risked their lives to protect life and property. Sergeant Torres covered up one serious wrongdoing with another serious wrongdoing - badgering me, the victim. There is no doubt in my mind that what the helicopter pilots did was deliberate and self serving in the same way as those who commit acts of violence against children, women, and pets. Sergeant Torres then retracted his 'confession' that I had obtained from him through careful questioning. He told me that the helicopter I saw was not SAPD's but was probably from one of the area cities' police departments. He said SAPD helicopters were royal blue with metal flaking and a gold stripe . I had described the helicopter as turquoise with a white diagonal stripe. Under my additional questioning, he did say that YES the word POLICE was on the underside of the SAPD helicopter. It should be clear to everyone that something is seriously wrong with SAPD if SAPD was not involved. Why wasn't the SAPD Helicopter Division concerned about the actions of that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter, especially since according to the information from Sergeant Torres, the helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, besides being piloted in what I considered a terroristic action, was also out of its area of jurisdiction??? I called several of the area cities' police departments to identify the city police department responsible for that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter. I received the same answer from all of them: The SAPD Helicopter Division handles the helicopter services for all San Antonio area cities' police departments and also for the Sheriff's Department. That alone should be sufficient proof that Sergeant Torres had told me another OUTRAGEOUS LIE but there was still the problem with the discrepancy in the color of the helicopter. I called area airports. Once they learned SAPD denied involvement, they referred me elsewhere (out of fear of personal involvement?). I called the City of San Antonio Aviation Department Noise Abatement Office @ 210-207-3471 and spoke with Jerry Brinken who identified the helicopter as SAPD regardless of the color discrepancy. He said he could only write up the helicopter incident as a noise complaint and allegedly did so. I called a number given to me as the San Antonio District Office Flight Service Station where flight plans are filed @ 1-800-WXBRIEF (992-7433). I spoke with someone with a name sounding like Woodren (spelling?) who said he could only give me information if I had a call number. I called FAA San Antonio Flight Standards District office @ 210-308-3300. I spoke with 'Gracie' who referred me to 'Gary' who asked me to call him back at 3 p.m. at which time he told me he was waiting on information from Linn Scott (spelling?) and to call him back again at 3:30 p.m. which I did. Gary told me he gave the information on the helicopter incident to the International San Antonio Airport and there was no identification for that kind of helicopter with police written on the underside and no call numbers. There was no consideration given for a helicopter with call numbers that were not easily visible/readable. By calling in a complaint and trying to identify the two San Antonio police officers/pilots responsible for the September 27, 2001 incident, I was targeted for severe and extreme mobbing by air in addition to ground mobbing. The San Antonio Police Department remains unaccountable for its act of air terrorism on a woman alone in her backyard less than three weeks after 9-11. The San Antonio Police Department is frighteningly out of control by the activities it has engaged in to cover up for its police officers wrongdoings. The San Antonio Police Department continues to abuse and misuse resources available to it after initiating and continuing to date a very public terroristic mobbing targeting me as a victim involving collusion of governmental agencies at the local, state, and federal levels and nongovernmental agencies. The terroristic stalking by air, using helicopters, that I have videotaped and identified ownership of, have involved helicopters owned by the Military, the Department of Public Safety, EMS agencies, media agencies, and U.S. Customs as well as ongoing terroristic stalking by helicopters owned by the San Antonio Police Department. For over five years, I have videotaped aircraft, involved in stalking me, flying over my home, my backyard, my FORMER office that I had no choice but to close, over me when I'm driving, in parking lots of shopping centers... I have videotaped fuel dumping over my back yard, terroristic circling, nose dive flying at and over me, and disabling deliberate migraine triggering aircraft sounds. In January, 2002, an employee of the Bexar County Sheriff''s department, Tammy Johnson, came to my home and asked me a substantial number of questions. I now understand the questions were to determine my vulnerability as a targeted victim. She even loaned me a camcorder to record the ongoing abuse. When I told her of my first successful recording of the ongoing SAPD helicopter terroristic flyovers, she couldn't get to my home fast enough to view the recording. She acted shocked and said that she didn't think I was going to be able to record the helicopter and then she left with the camcorder - but a blank tape inside. I switched tapes, not trusting her after the way she acted. I called her later and asked to borrow the camcorder to transfer the tape to a videotape to take to the San Antonio Police Chief, not trusting Internal Affairs anymore. She refused. She came to my home one more time. She told me she had bad news. She stated to me "They are going to kill you". "They" representing the terroristic stalking/mobbing network. She told me I needed to write my will and to sign my home over to her so that my pets would not be harmed. I refused. I had already paid her $2000 in cash at my bank out of the $10,000 requested to stop the terroristic stalking. She left angry. Later she called. She asked me if I knew about the woman who had been killed by two rottweilers. I said yes. (For the reader's information, a couple, who owned two Neapolitan mastiffs, hated their neighbor, a single attractive college educated woman. They would encourage their large dogs to act aggressively towards their neighbor who they hated so much until one day the dogs attacked and killed their neighbor). Bexar County Sheriff's Dep't employee, Tammy Johnson, then said "That should have been you those rottweilers killed. You are so passive you deserve to die". What she knew but you the reader does not know is that I have scarring on part of my upper lip and under my chin where I was bitten in the face when I was a child by the neighbor's dog and I was terrified for years of dogs I did not know until I learned quite a bit about dog behavior. I am a strong advocate for owning a dog and adopting that dog from the city pound where personally I feel the irresponsible owners should be, not the pets they treated like trash. Since then there was a brief news article in the San Antonio Express News about her. She had been the subject of a traffic stop and the officer who stopped her noted a smell from the car raising his suspicion of the use of an illicit drug. Of course she still wears the Bexar County Sheriff's Department uniform and service gun. Law enforcement is a family above the law and covers for its own. I need to add some more videos then I will tell you who I contacted for help... Obviously no one has yet been held accountable for the terroristic stalkings. I'm still videotaping and the stalkers are freaking out because I found youtube and while they may have been able to control covering up what they have done in San Antonio and Texas, anyone outside their retaliation range can speak out against what they are doing and get the legislation passed to stop this in my state and your state and our democratic nation. Please read what happened to Dr. Ramona Miller in the state of Missouri (web link below). http://www.abuseofpower.info/Wetendorf.htm http://hometown.aol.com/wbflegal/page12.html http://sites.securemc.com/folder13712/index.cfm?id=9323&fuseaction=browse&pageid=1 Ongoing Terroristic Stalking of assault and battery and rape victim Violence Against Women Violence against a health care professional Baptist Hospital nurses vs SAPD Official Oppression Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Violence Against Women Hate Crime OTHER... After 9-11, there was a television commercial paid for by the government. Terrorism was defined as threats, harassment, assault, and intimidation. The goal of terrorism was defined as to defeat your way of life. The commercial advised viewers to defeat terrorism. Terroristic Stalkers Character Profile: http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/abuse_connection.php Terroristic Stalkers: Established Goals: http://www.ncdsv.org/images/PowerControlwheelNOSHADING.pdf http://www.ncdsv.org/images/Police-perpetrateddomviolNOSHADING.pdf http://www.ncdsv.org/images/MilitarycontrolwheelNOSHADING.pdf The rarer the target victim, the more likely that victim will be tortured. Doctor victims are prize targets because they are rarely accessible to harm. Look at what was done to Dr. Ramona Miller and Dr. Philip Shue. Destroying the value of a Doctor's education, training and skills gives the abusers heightened enjoyment and power fulfillment. (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: ACLU Against Aggie Bad civil Cops Dr.Philip Dr.RamonaMiller rights Shue Stalking Terrorism Victim Violence Women
Rate it: Rate:
![drugs in sport[shoot the mesenger ]2](http://img.youtube.com/vi/nPbDFwQmxi8/1.jpg "drugs in sport[shoot the mesenger ]2")
18, 01:04, 2008-04-21 22:27:09 Description: drugs in sport ,the issue has long been one the media gets protective about, see here the mediawatch dog tear up one who dares to speak out about drugs and this overreaction by the watch dog clearly (More) drugs in sport ,the issue has long been one the media gets protective about, see here the mediawatch dog tear up one who dares to speak out about drugs and this overreaction by the watch dog clearly demonstratesthe beatup against those who would expose truths little wonder no one dares to reveal the truth about drugs ,used by our youth, our sports people infact most of sociaty uses one drug or another drug get real on all drugs ;hair sampling reveals all drugs used over the time span covered by the hair growth ,a simple rule change that simply tests hair ,that makes sports people keep a growing hair record can clean up drugs in sport, if it was so serious but drugs [all drugs are self medicating] people take a coffee heart starter inthe morning [caffeen] , have a nicoteen fix ,have thier shot of alcohol, or take a puff of cannabis , etc canabis is the only one that will show up under current testing regemes ,there is a kit that can scrub it and other drugs from the system[but not the hair] coincidentially both the system kits are owned by those who helped frame the tests and the drug laws for gross proffit drugs are rife , its basic human need that seeks coping mechanisms, truth , and trust, but most of all equality[noting most [by far] if not all ,in jail for drug use are poor the war on drugs is full of fearmongering and bias ,fraudulent research, and distorted facts , it boils down to govt policing a bias, that leaves the most dangerous drugs, alcohol/nicoteen,and the perscribed anphetomins as legal ,yet declares the safest[cheapest drugs for the highest criminal profit ,yet lowest risk, [the so called pre drug laws drugs] ] the most dangerous booze kills an average of 35 people per day , in an average size hospital ,yet isnt recognised because the facts are hidden in rape stats, road deaths, violence figures ,murders, and ''attributable'' to other causes , such as cigarettes ,yet also not reported upon any smoker is deemed to have died from smoking, no autopsies are conducted if a docter ascribes a cause of death[thus it becomes smoking , or in the rare cases of autopsy testing , the cannabis residue being the only one not cleared from the system is attributed , mainly because cannabisit is a plant [not a drug]and cannabinols are found in 30 other vegetables/plants [a fact under actual suppression] in this lie of a drug war ,that really is a war on truth ,to distract from the real drug problems[legal drugs] killing 3 jumbo jets [equivelent] each day in usa alone (Less)
Channel: youtube Rate it: Rate:
5, 06:32, 2008-04-22 09:05:25 Description: The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in (More) The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in the clear blue sky heading West above a small greenbelt area behind my home. The helicopter caught my attention for several reasons: I don't recall seeing a helicopter in the almost twelve years that I had lived at my residence before this date; air space was under restrictions due to the terrorists' September 11, 2001 air attacks on the U.S.; and it was less than three weeks from the horrifying terrorists' attacks of 9-11. I watched from my backyard as the helicopter turned and began heading North and flew over the property parallel to mine and over my neighbor's home. I looked and kept looking for any identifying letters and/or numbers on the aircraft's visible side and tail section but I didn't see any. I observed the helicopter as it flew over and past my neighbor's property, gaining altitude and heading slightly Northwest over the subdivision I live in. Abruptly, the helicopter turned around and was directed in a dive bomb descent over the roof of my home at me in my backyard. I went as far back as I could to the back corner of my fence and was trapped there at my locked six foot backyard gate that gives access to the greenbelt area behind my backyard. I'm grateful for the trees in the greenbelt area protectively backing up to my backyard and the power lines above my back fence. They restricted how low the helicopter could get. The helicopter HOVERED JUST ABOVE the power lines overhead. I read the word POLICE in bold letters on the underside of the helicopter. Then the helicopter after a long hovering, turned in place and headed North again. I ran to my house and grabbed my camera but the helicopter was by then out of sight. I called the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and spoke with Sergeant Moseley (spelling?) from Internal Affairs. He placed me on hold while he called and spoke with the SAPD Helicopter Division and relayed to me that he was told no SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time I gave him for the helicopter incident. I questioned him. Then where did the helicopter come from? Wasn't anyone concerned over what had just happened? In reply, he gave me the SAPD Helicopter Division phone number to call and talk to someone there which I did. I called the SAPD Helicopter Division and spoke with Sergeant Torres who identified himself as the SAPD supervising staff member of the SAPD Helicopter Division. I could not understand why Sergeant Torres was not concerned about what had happened, especially a helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, especially considering the heightened state of alert since 9-11 and concern that there could be more air attacks by terrorists. As I spoke with Sergeant Torres, he repeated some of what I said over the phone to an audience he had at his location. I could hear them laughing. They were laughing at me, laughing at my distress, laughing at my fear for the safety of others who could become targets of the unidentified helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside that had just terrorized me in my backyard. Why were they laughing? Why didn't they think that what I told them was alarming? I kept questioning Sergeant Torres until he finally 'confessed' that, YES, an SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time given. He said they were looking for an abandoned vehicle. In my small fenced-in back yard? He said 'they' didn't see me. An OUTRAGEOUS LIE. Anyone who's flown in a plane and looked out the window, while it was daylight, during a take-off and/or landing, is aware of how well 'they' in the helicopter did see me as 'they' were flying just a few feet above the height of typical streetside power lines. I told Sergeant Torres that what 'they' did was terrifying, my heart was pounding when it happened, that it was not funny, and that I could have had a heart attack (family history of heart attacks and strokes), and that what 'they' did was irresponsible. Sergeant Torres' reply was a threatening tirade on how I needed to be supportive of law enforcement and the officers who risked their lives to protect life and property. Sergeant Torres covered up one serious wrongdoing with another serious wrongdoing - badgering me, the victim. There is no doubt in my mind that what the helicopter pilots did was deliberate and self serving in the same way as those who commit acts of violence against children, women, and pets. Sergeant Torres then retracted his 'confession' that I had obtained from him through careful questioning. He told me that the helicopter I saw was not SAPD's but was probably from one of the area cities' police departments. He said SAPD helicopters were royal blue with metal flaking and a gold stripe . I had described the helicopter as turquoise with a white diagonal stripe. Under my additional questioning, he did say that YES the word POLICE was on the underside of the SAPD helicopter. It should be clear to everyone that something is seriously wrong with SAPD if SAPD was not involved. Why wasn't the SAPD Helicopter Division concerned about the actions of that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter, especially since according to the information from Sergeant Torres, the helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, besides being piloted in what I considered a terroristic action, was also out of its area of jurisdiction??? I called several of the area cities' police departments to identify the city police department responsible for that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter. I received the same answer from all of them: The SAPD Helicopter Division handles the helicopter services for all San Antonio area cities' police departments and also for the Sheriff's Department. That alone should be sufficient proof that Sergeant Torres had told me another OUTRAGEOUS LIE but there was still the problem with the discrepancy in the color of the helicopter. I called area airports. Once they learned SAPD denied involvement, they referred me elsewhere (out of fear of personal involvement?). I called the City of San Antonio Aviation Department Noise Abatement Office @ 210-207-3471 and spoke with Jerry Brinken who identified the helicopter as SAPD regardless of the color discrepancy. He said he could only write up the helicopter incident as a noise complaint and allegedly did so. I called a number given to me as the San Antonio District Office Flight Service Station where flight plans are filed @ 1-800-WXBRIEF (992-7433). I spoke with someone with a name sounding like Woodren (spelling?) who said he could only give me information if I had a call number. I called FAA San Antonio Flight Standards District office @ 210-308-3300. I spoke with 'Gracie' who referred me to 'Gary' who asked me to call him back at 3 p.m. at which time he told me he was waiting on information from Linn Scott (spelling?) and to call him back again at 3:30 p.m. which I did. Gary told me he gave the information on the helicopter incident to the International San Antonio Airport and there was no identification for that kind of helicopter with police written on the underside and no call numbers. There was no consideration given for a helicopter with call numbers that were not easily visible/readable. By calling in a complaint and trying to identify the two San Antonio police officers/pilots responsible for the September 27, 2001 incident, I was targeted for severe and extreme mobbing by air in addition to ground mobbing. The San Antonio Police Department remains unaccountable for its act of air terrorism on a woman alone in her backyard less than three weeks after 9-11. The San Antonio Police Department is frighteningly out of control by the activities it has engaged in to cover up for its police officers wrongdoings. The San Antonio Police Department continues to abuse and misuse resources available to it after initiating and continuing to date a very public terroristic mobbing targeting me as a victim involving collusion of governmental agencies at the local, state, and federal levels and nongovernmental agencies. The terroristic stalking by air, using helicopters, that I have videotaped and identified ownership of, have involved helicopters owned by the Military, the Department of Public Safety, EMS agencies, media agencies, and U.S. Customs as well as ongoing terroristic stalking by helicopters owned by the San Antonio Police Department. For over five years, I have videotaped aircraft, involved in stalking me, flying over my home, my backyard, my FORMER office that I had no choice but to close, over me when I'm driving, in parking lots of shopping centers... I have videotaped fuel dumping over my back yard, terroristic circling, nose dive flying at and over me, and disabling deliberate migraine triggering aircraft sounds. In January, 2002, an employee of the Bexar County Sheriff''s department, Tammy Johnson, came to my home and asked me a substantial number of questions. I now understand the questions were to determine my vulnerability as a targeted victim. She even loaned me a camcorder to record the ongoing abuse. When I told her of my first successful recording of the ongoing SAPD helicopter terroristic flyovers, she couldn't get to my home fast enough to view the recording. She acted shocked and said that she didn't think I was going to be able to record the helicopter and then she left with the camcorder - but a blank tape inside. I switched tapes, not trusting her after the way she acted. I called her later and asked to borrow the camcorder to transfer the tape to a videotape to take to the San Antonio Police Chief, not trusting Internal Affairs anymore. She refused. She came to my home one more time. She told me she had bad news. She stated to me "They are going to kill you". "They" representing the terroristic stalking/mobbing network. She told me I needed to write my will and to sign my home over to her so that my pets would not be harmed. I refused. I had already paid her $2000 in cash at my bank out of the $10,000 requested to stop the terroristic stalking. She left angry. Later she called. She asked me if I knew about the woman who had been killed by two rottweilers. I said yes. (For the reader's information, a couple, who owned two Neapolitan mastiffs, hated their neighbor, a single attractive college educated woman. They would encourage their large dogs to act aggressively towards their neighbor who they hated so much until one day the dogs attacked and killed their neighbor). Bexar County Sheriff's Dep't employee, Tammy Johnson, then said "That should have been you those rottweilers killed. You are so passive you deserve to die". What she knew but you the reader does not know is that I have scarring on part of my upper lip and under my chin where I was bitten in the face when I was a child by the neighbor's dog and I was terrified for years of dogs I did not know until I learned quite a bit about dog behavior. I am a strong advocate for owning a dog and adopting that dog from the city pound where personally I feel the irresponsible owners should be, not the pets they treated like trash. Since then there was a brief news article in the San Antonio Express News about her. She had been the subject of a traffic stop and the officer who stopped her noted a smell from the car raising his suspicion of the use of an illicit drug. Of course she still wears the Bexar County Sheriff's Department uniform and service gun. Law enforcement is a family above the law and covers for its own. I need to add some more videos then I will tell you who I contacted for help... Obviously no one has yet been held accountable for the terroristic stalkings. I'm still videotaping and the stalkers are freaking out because I found youtube and while they may have been able to control covering up what they have done in San Antonio and Texas, anyone outside their retaliation range can speak out against what they are doing and get the legislation passed to stop this in my state and your state and our democratic nation. Please read what happened to Dr. Ramona Miller in the state of Missouri (web link below). http://www.abuseofpower.info/Wetendorf.htm http://hometown.aol.com/wbflegal/page12.html http://sites.securemc.com/folder13712/index.cfm?id=9323&fuseaction=browse&pageid=1 Ongoing Terroristic Stalking of assault and battery and rape victim Violence Against Women Violence against a health care professional Baptist Hospital nurses vs SAPD Official Oppression Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Violence Against Women Hate Crime OTHER... After 9-11, there was a television commercial paid for by the government. Terrorism was defined as threats, harassment, assault, and intimidation. The goal of terrorism was defined as to defeat your way of life. The commercial advised viewers to defeat terrorism. Terroristic Stalkers Character Profile: http://www.pet-abuse.com/pages/abuse_connection.php Terroristic Stalkers: Established Goals: http://www.ncdsv.org/images/PowerControlwheelNOSHADING.pdf http://www.ncdsv.org/images/Police-perpetrateddomviolNOSHADING.pdf http://www.ncdsv.org/images/MilitarycontrolwheelNOSHADING.pdf The rarer the target victim, the more likely that victim will be tortured. Doctor victims are prize targets because they are rarely accessible to harm. Look at what was done to Dr. Ramona Miller and Dr. Philip Shue. Destroying the value of a Doctor's education, training and skills gives the abusers heightened enjoyment and power fulfillment. (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: ACLU Against Aggie Bad civil Cops Dr.Philip Dr.RamonaMiller rights Shue Stalking Terrorism Victim Violence Women
Rate it: Rate:
1, 06:05, 2008-04-22 09:05:25 Description: Youtube limits video to 100 MB. This video is 88.8 MB out of 192.6 MB and represents the second part out of three for the 10-1-05 video. The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio (More) Youtube limits video to 100 MB. This video is 88.8 MB out of 192.6 MB and represents the second part out of three for the 10-1-05 video. The very public terroristic stalking by air by San Antonio police officers using police helicopters began on September 27, 2001. At or about 11:45 a.m. on that date, I observed a helicopter flying in the clear blue sky heading West above a small greenbelt area behind my home. The helicopter caught my attention for several reasons: I don't recall seeing a helicopter in the almost twelve years that I had lived at my residence before this date; air space was under restrictions due to the terrorists' September 11, 2001 air attacks on the U.S.; and it was less than three weeks from the horrifying terrorists' attacks of 9-11. I watched from my backyard as the helicopter turned and began heading North and flew over the property parallel to mine and over my neighbor's home. I looked and kept looking for any identifying letters and/or numbers on the aircraft's visible side and tail section but I didn't see any. I observed the helicopter as it flew over and past my neighbor's property, gaining altitude and heading slightly Northwest over the subdivision I live in. Abruptly, the helicopter turned around and was directed in a dive bomb descent over the roof of my home at me in my backyard. I went as far back as I could to the back corner of my fence and was trapped there at my locked six foot backyard gate that gives access to the greenbelt area behind my backyard. I'm grateful for the trees in the greenbelt area protectively backing up to my backyard and the power lines above my back fence. They restricted how low the helicopter could get. The helicopter HOVERED JUST ABOVE the power lines overhead. I read the word POLICE in bold letters on the underside of the helicopter. Then the helicopter after a long hovering, turned in place and headed North again. I ran to my house and grabbed my camera but the helicopter was by then out of sight. I called the San Antonio Police Department (SAPD) and spoke with Sergeant Moseley (spelling?) from Internal Affairs. He placed me on hold while he called and spoke with the SAPD Helicopter Division and relayed to me that he was told no SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time I gave him for the helicopter incident. I questioned him. Then where did the helicopter come from? Wasn't anyone concerned over what had just happened? In reply, he gave me the SAPD Helicopter Division phone number to call and talk to someone there which I did. I called the SAPD Helicopter Division and spoke with Sergeant Torres who identified himself as the SAPD supervising staff member of the SAPD Helicopter Division. I could not understand why Sergeant Torres was not concerned about what had happened, especially a helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, especially considering the heightened state of alert since 9-11 and concern that there could be more air attacks by terrorists. As I spoke with Sergeant Torres, he repeated some of what I said over the phone to an audience he had at his location. I could hear them laughing. They were laughing at me, laughing at my distress, laughing at my fear for the safety of others who could become targets of the unidentified helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside that had just terrorized me in my backyard. Why were they laughing? Why didn't they think that what I told them was alarming? I kept questioning Sergeant Torres until he finally 'confessed' that, YES, an SAPD helicopter was in my area at the time given. He said they were looking for an abandoned vehicle. In my small fenced-in back yard? He said 'they' didn't see me. An OUTRAGEOUS LIE. Anyone who's flown in a plane and looked out the window, while it was daylight, during a take-off and/or landing, is aware of how well 'they' in the helicopter did see me as 'they' were flying just a few feet above the height of typical streetside power lines. I told Sergeant Torres that what 'they' did was terrifying, my heart was pounding when it happened, that it was not funny, and that I could have had a heart attack (family history of heart attacks and strokes), and that what 'they' did was irresponsible. Sergeant Torres' reply was a threatening tirade on how I needed to be supportive of law enforcement and the officers who risked their lives to protect life and property. Sergeant Torres covered up one serious wrongdoing with another serious wrongdoing - badgering me, the victim. There is no doubt in my mind that what the helicopter pilots did was deliberate and self serving in the same way as those who commit acts of violence against children, women, and pets. Sergeant Torres then retracted his 'confession' that I had obtained from him through careful questioning. He told me that the helicopter I saw was not SAPD's but was probably from one of the area cities' police departments. He said SAPD helicopters were royal blue with metal flaking and a gold stripe . I had described the helicopter as turquoise with a white diagonal stripe. Under my additional questioning, he did say that YES the word POLICE was on the underside of the SAPD helicopter. It should be clear to everyone that something is seriously wrong with SAPD if SAPD was not involved. Why wasn't the SAPD Helicopter Division concerned about the actions of that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter, especially since according to the information from Sergeant Torres, the helicopter with the word POLICE on its underside, besides being piloted in what I considered a terroristic action, was also out of its area of jurisdiction??? I called several of the area cities' police departments to identify the city police department responsible for that 'NOT SAPD' helicopter. I received the same answer from all of them: The SAPD Helicopter Division handles the helicopter services for all San Antonio area cities' police departments and also for the Sheriff's Department. That alone should be sufficient proof that Sergeant Torres had told me another OUTRAGEOUS LIE but there was still the problem with the discrepancy in the color of the helicopter. I called area airports. Once they learned SAPD denied involvement, they referred me elsewhere (out of fear of personal involvement?). I called the City of San Antonio Aviation Department Noise Abatement Office @ 210-207-3471 and spoke with Jerry Brinken who identified the helicopter as SAPD regardless of the color discrepancy. He said he could only write up the helicopter incident as a noise complaint and allegedly did so. I called a number given to me as the San Antonio District Office Flight Service Station where flight plans are filed @ 1-800-WXBRIEF (992-7433). I spoke with someone with a name sounding like Woodren (spelling?) who said he could only give me information if I had a call number. I called FAA San Antonio Flight Standards District office @ 210-308-3300. I spoke with 'Gracie' who referred me to 'Gary' who asked me to call him back at 3 p.m. at which time he told me he was waiting on information from Linn Scott (spelling?) and to call him back again at 3:30 p.m. which I did. Gary told me he gave the information on the helicopter incident to the International San Antonio Airport and there was no identification for that kind of helicopter with police written on the underside and no call numbers. There was no consideration given for a helicopter with call numbers that were not easily visible/readable. By calling in a complaint and trying to identify the two San Antonio police officers/pilots responsible for the September 27, 2001 incident, I was targeted for severe and extreme mobbing by air in addition to ground mobbing. The San Antonio Police Department remains unaccountable for its act of air terrorism on a woman alone in her backyard less than three weeks after 9-11. The San Antonio Police Department is frighteningly out of control by the activities it has engaged in to cover up for its police officers wrongdoings. The San Antonio Police Department continues to abuse and misuse resources available to it after initiating and continuing to date a very public terroristic mobbing targeting me as a victim involving collusion of governmental agencies at the local, state, and federal levels and nongovernmental agencies. The terroristic stalking by air, using helicopters, that I have videotaped and identified ownership of, have involved helicopters owned by the Military, the Department of Public Safety, EMS agencies, media agencies, and U.S. Customs as well as ongoing terroristic stalking by helicopters owned by the San Antonio Police Department. For over five years, I have videotaped aircraft, involved in stalking me, flying over my home, my backyard, my FORMER office that I had no choice but to close, over me when I'm driving, in parking lots of shopping centers... I have videotaped fuel dumping over my back yard, terroristic circling, nose dive flying at and over me, and disabling deliberate migraine triggering aircraft sounds. In January, 2002, an employee of the Bexar County Sheriff''s department, Tammy Johnson, came to my home and asked me a substantial number of questions. I now understand the questions were to determine my vulnerability as a targeted victim. She even loaned me a camcorder to record the ongoing abuse. When I told her of my first successful recording of the ongoing SAPD helicopter terroristic flyovers, she couldn't get to my home fast enough to view the recording. She acted shocked and said that she didn't think I was going to be able to record the helicopter and then she left with the camcorder - but a blank tape inside. I switched tapes, not trusting her after the way she acted. I called her later and asked to borrow the camcorder to transfer the tape to a videotape to take to the San Antonio Police Chief, not trusting Internal Affairs anymore. She refused. She came to my home one more time. She told me she had bad news. She stated to me "They are going to kill you". "They" representing the terroristic stalking/mobbing network. She told me I needed to write my will and to sign my home over to her so that my pets would not be harmed. I refused. I had already paid her $2000 in cash at my bank out of the $10,000 requested to stop the terroristic stalking. She left angry. Later she called. She asked me if I knew about the woman who had been killed by two rottweilers. I said yes. (For the reader's information, a couple, who owned two Neapolitan mastiffs, hated their neighbor, a single attractive college educated woman. They would encourage their large dogs to act aggressively towards their neighbor who they hated so much until one day the dogs attacked and killed their neighbor). Bexar County Sheriff's Dep't employee, Tammy Johnson, then said "That should have been you those rottweilers killed. You are so passive you deserve to die". What she knew but you the reader does not know is that I have scarring on part of my upper lip and under my chin where I was bitten in the face when I was a child by the neighbor's dog and I was terrified for years of dogs I did not know until I learned quite a bit about dog behavior. I am a strong advocate for owning a dog and adopting that dog from the city pound where personally I feel the irresponsible owners should be, not the pets they treated like trash. Since then there was a brief news article in the San Antonio Express News about her. She had been the subject of a traffic stop and the officer who stopped her noted a smell from the car raising his suspicion of the use of an illicit drug. Of course she still wears the Bexar County Sheriff's Department uniform and service gun. Law enforcement is a family above the law and covers for its own. I need to add some more videos then I will tell you who I contacted for help... Obviously no one has yet been held accountable for the terroristic stalkings. I'm still videotaping and the stalkers are freaking out because I found youtube and while they may have been able to control covering up what they have done in San Antonio and Texas, anyone outside their retaliation range can speak out against what they are doing and get the legislation passed to stop this in my state and your state and our democratic nation. Please read what happened to Dr. Ramona Miller in the state of Missouri (web link below). http://www.abuseofpower.info/Wetendorf.htm http://hometown.aol.com/wbflegal/page12.html http://sites.securemc.com/folder13712/index.cfm?id=9323&fuseaction=browse&pageid=1 Ongoing Terroristic Stalking of assault and battery and rape victim Violence Against Women Violence against a health care professional Baptist Hospital nurses vs SAPD Official Oppression Obstruction of Justice Retaliation Violence Against Women Hate Crime OTHER... (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: ACLU Against Aggie Bad civil Cops Dr.Philip Dr.RamonaMiller rights Shue Stalking Terrorism Victim Violence Women
Rate it: Rate:
7, 09:11, 2008-04-21 16:56:06 Description: Tuesday, youth psychiatric abuse survivor, and contributor to AgainstPsychiatry!, tells the first part of her two part story of psychiatric abuse in group homes, drug rehab centers, homeless shelters, (More) Tuesday, youth psychiatric abuse survivor, and contributor to AgainstPsychiatry!, tells the first part of her two part story of psychiatric abuse in group homes, drug rehab centers, homeless shelters, psychiatric wards, jails, and public housing programs. December 2007. Check out http://www.againstpsychiatry.com for more info. (Less)
Channel: youtubeTags: abuse addiction drugs harm homeless housing illness jail mental psychiatry psychology public rape reduction
Rate it: Rate:
0, 06:34, 2009-08-15 12:36:21 Description: dont miss part 2 if you ever wanna talk hit me up on skype (gods_servant77)
Channel: youtubeTags: self hurt harm injury opression depression anxiety anorexia mutilation Love Jesus Christ abuse drug addiction domestic violence rape victom abuser suffering throw up purge starvation suicidal tendencies cut cutter scar bruise pain alone lonely distress help occult safe healing God Holy Spirit christian trigger problems life live die death choice
Rate it: Rate:
0, 07:50, 2009-10-08 05:38:56 Description: Heather Powers talks about her struggles with drug addiction and past events in her life. Part 2 of 4
Channel: youtube Rate it: Rate:
Recent searches
1h 6s ago amateur 5s ago austin reines 7s ago balcony 5s ago bid boobs 2s ago dick milking video 2s ago free anti recoil hack for... 1s ago gay guy fucks animal 1s ago girlfuckguy 6s ago gloryhole 2s ago jenny rivera haciendo una... 4s ago little coco 0s ago mom bath 6s ago piss 4s ago priya rai teen indian 3s ago serial opera 8 65 2s ago sexy girl fight 6s ago squirting 5s ago starship troppers 6s ago stormy 1s ago taboo charming mother 1s ago teen casting 6s ago trio 2s ago vce testing 3s ago white album powder snow 6s ago
Recently watched videos
What is viral today ?
Quicklist (0)
No videos on quicklist
This list is temporary even if You are logged in. You can save it to permanent list.
My video lists
You must be logged to see all your lists. Please log in here.
Bookmark us
Please, link us: