exploitation Videos - FilesTube Video Search

07.Vulnerability Exploitation

11,

03:23,

2008-04-02 13:23:39

Description: 07.Vulnerability Exploitation

Channel: veoh

Tags: ethcial hacking networking security hackers hacking vulnerability exploitation

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

UNICEF: Sex tourism and child exploitation

75,

02:52,

2008-04-29 10:50:28

Description: FLORENCE, Italy, 25 April 2008 -- Two related topics -- combating child sex tourism, and corporate social responsibility -- were key discussion points at the expert consultation on child sexual (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: child exploitation human Innocenti tourism trafficking UNICEF

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Exploitation FAQ 1 of 2

8,

09:30,

2008-04-03 07:04:46

Description: Q. I don't make anything in my job. Am I still being exploited? A lot of jobs don't produce goods and services- police men, bank clerks, cashiers. The distinction that is usually made is (More) Q. I don't make anything in my job. Am I still being exploited? A lot of jobs don't produce goods and services- police men, bank clerks, cashiers. The distinction that is usually made is referred to as the difference between productive and unproductive labor. Q. Are basketball players exploited? Basketball players work. They work for large capitalist enterprises. But they make way more money than most workers. It is really hard to believe that they are being exploited. Those large capitalist enterprises are still making a profit above what is paid to the players. They wouldn't pay players those profits if they couldn't make a profit from them. There is class conflict in the sports industry. Players go on strike...there is always a battle over how much surplus the capitalist takes. Basketball players aren't the only ones who work for their team. From trainers, coaches and pr men to the guys that clean the seats after the game and hose down the locker room, or the guys that work the cameras- there is a massive amount of labor that goes into a basketball game before it is delivered to you via TV. Many of those people are not paid well. It seems that ball players- because they have a monopoly over a highly prized skill, are able to command much more of the surplus created in a sports franchise than any other worker. Some class theorists refer to this as skill exploitation- that highly skilled workers get some of the surplus value created by less skilled workers. In that sense the skilled workers benefit from the low pay of the unskilled workers. This drives a wedge between the workers in a particular firm, putting them at odds with each other instead of being united against a capitalist class. 1 workers can have different relationships to surplus value due to skills and or their relation to the coordination of production (managers). 2. these different relationships affect objective things like their wages, and subjective things like their class solidarity. Q. Nobody works at my laundromat. How is profit made? You see, the laundromat isn't really selling a commodity to you. Instead you are renting the use of a machine for 30 minutes. No value is being produced. The same is true for a landlord. A landlord owns a house and charges you to live in it. You aren't producing a commodity and the landlord isn't producing a commodity. You are just paying the landlord for the use of his property. Landromats and rental housing can generate a lot of income for their owners. But these owners aren't engaging in the production of commodities, thus they are not creating new values. So where does their income come from if they don't create value? Their income comes out of the wages of workers who pay out a portion of their wages for the use of the landlord's property. These wages come from their work- productive work which creates value. In a sense landromat owners and landlords are leeches- sucking some of the wages out of society without contributing to the creation of value. Q. Patagonia... Isn't it possible for profit to be made through exchange, and for workers to be paid fairly? A. Assuming you could convince all people to shop ethically instead of in their own economic interests, this would entail some new vision of capitalist competition- somehow capitalists couldn't compete anymore by lowering prices... or maybe you are proposing that all industries be monopolized, or severe restrictions to competition be enforced by states. Bourgeois economists consider profit to be a result of different preferences in exchange (marginal utility theory), while marxists consider profit to be a result of the exploitation of labor. If we take the entire social product (W), workers produce all of W. W is divided into v (variable capital-the amount workers are paid for producing w) and s (surplus value- the amount appropriated by capitalists (W=S+V). S is the profit. You seem to be advocating a system whereby the prices of commodities are all inflated above the value of W so that commodities exchange at W+S. If the price of all commodities are inflated, isn't that the same as the prices of no commodities being inflated? But how do we measure V relative to W and S anyway? In other words, how do we know workers are being paid for the entire social product? We need some way of measuring V and W. They are both expressions of the amount of labor that goes into them, but they are only quantified in society through money prices. In other words, in your model where the price of the commodity is W+S, how do we know how much of that money price should go to the laborer and how much should go to the capitalist? All we have really done is to change the variables in the equation in order to end up with the same equation.... profit= W+S is the same as saying profit=S+V. The question is always: "how much of the prices of a commodity belong to the capitalist and how much to the laborer?" (Less)

Channel: youtube

Tags: anarchism capitalism communism engels exploitation FAQ globalization karl marx profit revolution socialism sweatshop vi

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Horror Montage 2! Cult! Gore! Exploitation! Blood! N...

23,

00:54,

2007-12-13 18:50:01

Description: Promo Montage from 1999. New York Film Academy B Movie Fridays were a tradition in the late 1990's started by film professor and horror/exploitation fan Bryan Norton. Screenings were held in the (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: B-Movie blood boobs Bryan Burning comedy exploitation grindhouse horror jaws Montage Norton NYFA scary slasher tits

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

MTV EXIT End Exploitation & Trafficking "Shoes" CM

3,

00:29,

2007-11-05 06:10:18

Description: MTV JAPAN EXIT END EXPLOITATION AND TRAFFICKING TV CM (人身取引から、人間を解放する活動。）

Channel: youtube

Tags: Abduction ad CM CPI EXIT exploitation Fallon Keiichi MTV Plus Step TRAFFICKING Uemura 人身取引吉田泰人桑原真一桑原陽植村啓一

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Hell hath no fury like a wo... (Video no longer available)

Description: Chingmy Yau plays a girl who uses herself as bait to trap a serial rapist who had killed her best friend in this classic Wong Jing hong kong cat III exploitation movie "Raped by an angel"

526,

07:47,

2008-02-01 11:49:37

Channel: youtube

exploitation of women in commercial rap

16,

02:27,

2007-08-24 17:19:31

Description: exploitation of women in commerical rap(hip hop, teen bop rap & gangster rap). I used BET's 106 & Park as the source matirel, and just included scenes including women and the portral (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: area art bay california commerical debord exploitation Gangster guy ketelle lucas rap spectle stertypes video women

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Halo pick up v.3 Exploitation forestière

5,

01:53,

2008-04-13 00:51:55

Description: et voila la 3ème version de la nouvelle discipline qu'est le pick up quelque pick up, toujours non modé sur la map exploitation forestière

Channel: youtube

Tags: black CE exploitation faciliter forestière glitch halo in la map men Mod modé non perieux pick tys up vie wartog

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Exploitation travailleurs immigrés

0,

06:02,

2008-07-05 07:02:53

Description: Exploitation travailleurs immigrés

Channel: dailymotion

Tags: Exploitation travailleurs immigrés

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

exploitation and city building

7,

03:33,

2008-07-25 02:29:54

Description: sorting out exploitation and city building --- This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License

Channel: youtube

Tags: building cities city civilization exploitation philosophy relativistic skepticism slavery war

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Exploitation FAQ 1 of 2

9,

09:30,

2008-04-21 18:45:04

Description: Q. I don't make anything in my job. Am I still being exploited? A lot of jobs don't produce goods and services- police men, bank clerks, cashiers. The distinction that is usually made is (More) Q. I don't make anything in my job. Am I still being exploited? A lot of jobs don't produce goods and services- police men, bank clerks, cashiers. The distinction that is usually made is referred to as the difference between productive and unproductive labor. Q. Are basketball players exploited? Basketball players work. They work for large capitalist enterprises. But they make way more money than most workers. It is really hard to believe that they are being exploited. Those large capitalist enterprises are still making a profit above what is paid to the players. They wouldn't pay players those profits if they couldn't make a profit from them. There is class conflict in the sports industry. Players go on strike...there is always a battle over how much surplus the capitalist takes. Basketball players aren't the only ones who work for their team. From trainers, coaches and pr men to the guys that clean the seats after the game and hose down the locker room, or the guys that work the cameras- there is a massive amount of labor that goes into a basketball game before it is delivered to you via TV. Many of those people are not paid well. It seems that ball players- because they have a monopoly over a highly prized skill, are able to command much more of the surplus created in a sports franchise than any other worker. Some class theorists refer to this as skill exploitation- that highly skilled workers get some of the surplus value created by less skilled workers. In that sense the skilled workers benefit from the low pay of the unskilled workers. This drives a wedge between the workers in a particular firm, putting them at odds with each other instead of being united against a capitalist class. 1 workers can have different relationships to surplus value due to skills and or their relation to the coordination of production (managers). 2. these different relationships affect objective things like their wages, and subjective things like their class solidarity. Q. Nobody works at my laundromat. How is profit made? You see, the laundromat isn't really selling a commodity to you. Instead you are renting the use of a machine for 30 minutes. No value is being produced. The same is true for a landlord. A landlord owns a house and charges you to live in it. You aren't producing a commodity and the landlord isn't producing a commodity. You are just paying the landlord for the use of his property. Landromats and rental housing can generate a lot of income for their owners. But these owners aren't engaging in the production of commodities, thus they are not creating new values. So where does their income come from if they don't create value? Their income comes out of the wages of workers who pay out a portion of their wages for the use of the landlord's property. These wages come from their work- productive work which creates value. In a sense landromat owners and landlords are leeches- sucking some of the wages out of society without contributing to the creation of value. Q. Patagonia... Isn't it possible for profit to be made through exchange, and for workers to be paid fairly? A. Assuming you could convince all people to shop ethically instead of in their own economic interests, this would entail some new vision of capitalist competition- somehow capitalists couldn't compete anymore by lowering prices... or maybe you are proposing that all industries be monopolized, or severe restrictions to competition be enforced by states. Bourgeois economists consider profit to be a result of different preferences in exchange (marginal utility theory), while marxists consider profit to be a result of the exploitation of labor. If we take the entire social product (W), workers produce all of W. W is divided into v (variable capital-the amount workers are paid for producing w) and s (surplus value- the amount appropriated by capitalists (W=S+V). S is the profit. You seem to be advocating a system whereby the prices of commodities are all inflated above the value of W so that commodities exchange at W+S. If the price of all commodities are inflated, isn't that the same as the prices of no commodities being inflated? But how do we measure V relative to W and S anyway? In other words, how do we know workers are being paid for the entire social product? We need some way of measuring V and W. They are both expressions of the amount of labor that goes into them, but they are only quantified in society through money prices. In other words, in your model where the price of the commodity is W+S, how do we know how much of that money price should go to the laborer and how much should go to the capitalist? All we have really done is to change the variables in the equation in order to end up with the same equation.... profit= W+S is the same as saying profit=S+V. The question is always: "how much of the prices of a commodity belong to the capitalist and how much to the laborer?" (Less)

Channel: youtube

Tags: anarchism capitalism communism engels exploitation FAQ globalization karl marx profit revolution socialism sweatshop vi

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Exploitation FAQ 2 of 2

11,

08:41,

2008-04-21 21:34:48

Description: Q. I steal shit from my boss. Does that cancel out exploitation? No. Stealing shit from your boss doesn't change the fact that you are producing more value than you are paid for. It's very (More) Q. I steal shit from my boss. Does that cancel out exploitation? No. Stealing shit from your boss doesn't change the fact that you are producing more value than you are paid for. It's very unlikely that you could steal enough from your boss to make up the difference. If everyone did this the company would cease to make a profit- so this isn't really a long run strategy for economic justice. The more important point though is probably this: there are lots of ways in which workers resist exploitation. They work slower, they don't let their managers know how fast they could work, they sabotage things, they milk the clock, in short they play lots of little games that give them the subjective sense that they are maintaining some of autonomy and dignity within the degradations of wage labor. These games are a double-edged sword: on one hand workers are carving out autonomous space that allows them to survive psychologically in a realm where they have little control over their labor; on the other hand, this works as a temporary pallative that gives workers a false sense of control and comfort, keeping them from addressing the real problem: capitalism. Q. The bars downtown charge more for the same beer than the ones in west philly. Does that mean they are exploiting their workers more even though those workers do the same amount of work? Differences in price can be attributed to many things. Exploitation needs to be seen as an underlying process expressed in prices which fluctuate around an equilibrium. In your case rent is probably the biggest factor in the difference in price. Rent is another big issue that I hope to address at length elsewhere. Q. I am self-employed. Do I exploit myself? A:No. You are not creating value for a capitalist who then pays you for only a portion of that value. Self employed people are an autonomous class separate from workers and capitalists. Of course, many people who are are nominally self-emplyed sub-contract or do part-time work as wage laborers. Self employed people are often put in the same category as the petit bourgeois. There are many types of self employed people: carpenters, piano teachers, house servants, Q. I work for the government. Am I exploited? Surely your experience as a government employee is similar to the lived experience of those of us employed by capitalists: you work for a wage and your employer wants to maximize the amount of labor he/she gets out of you. The government seeks to raise productivity relative to labor cost. Yet the government is not making a profit from you when it does this because it isn't selling your product as a commodity. (unless you work for a government run enterprise.) Thus many government employees- teachers, secretaries, cops- do not produce surplus value for a capitalist. However their jobs are essential to the process of surplus value creation that happens elsewhere in the economy. (teachers train future workers. cops protect private property. etc.) The question then is whether these people who don't produce surplus value but whose jobs are crucial to the economic order can be considered exploited. I think this depends on our definition of the concept of exploitation and what we are using it for. But I will venture, for now, that the answer should be a "qualified yes". I hope to go into this further in my future video on Productive and Unproductive labor. Q. I work for a non-profit. Am I exploited? Many non-profits still make a profit. Many sell commodities. Others- social services, churches, etc. pay their employees with donated or government money. Though the employees may do useful, purposeful work, they don't create profit for a capitalist and thus fall outside of the scope of capitalist production relations- they don't produce surplus value. This then leads to the same answer as the previous question about government employees. But still the bigger question is: if you don't produce surplus value does that mean you can't be exploited? Stay tuned for a future video entitled "Who is exploited?" that will address these questions more deeply. Q. How can I not exploit my employees? Turn your enterprise into a cooperatively owned and run workplace. Employees vote on their salaries, on reinvestment strategies, etc. Everyone has a say in decisions equal to the degree that those decisions effect them. Then go get a book called Parecon by Michael Albert. Use your vast powers as a capitalist to create the society he describes. (Less)

Channel: youtube

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

DIY exploitation 1 of 2

7,

09:03,

2008-04-22 09:48:23

Description: If you are going to end up with more money than you started with, you are going have to create more value than you pay for in the production process. "Couldn't I just charge more for my (More) If you are going to end up with more money than you started with, you are going have to create more value than you pay for in the production process. "Couldn't I just charge more for my products than it costs me to make them?" Well, not really- you are competing in the marketplace with other capitalists, all of which are trying to lower their prices to out-sell each other, you can't just raise your prices arbitrarily to create profit. Instead of worrying about prices in the marketplace you need to figure out a way to create more value in the production process than you pay for. You have two different types of input: constant and variable capital. Constant capital inputs are incapable of creating more value. That's why we call them constant. Machines, raw materials, factories... as they are used up, these inputs pass on their value to the commodities you produce. There is no way to make them create more value than they are initially worth. Variable capital can create more value than you pay for it. That's because variable capital is human labor. When you pay a worker to work for an hour, you have no idea how much value they are going to produce. They could work hard, or take it easy. They could be productive or unproductive. They can be cheap of expensive to hire. Everything is variable. It will be a constant struggle to figure out the best way to get the most value out of them at the least cost. Sometimes they will even resist. They're a huge pain in the ass but you're going to have to get used to them because this unique variability is what allows you to make a profit at all. So, how exactly do you go about exploiting them? Equation: e=s/v This equation measures the rate of exploitation. In the denominator is the money you have spent on variable capital (wages). In the nominator is the surplus that you the workers produce for you (profit). Workers will work to produce enough value to cover the money you laid out for their wages. The rest of the work the workers do is surplus value- your source of profit. Constant capital (c) is missing from the equation. Constant capital does impart it's value/cost onto the commodities as well but it cannot produce extra surplus. Your goal is to increase e. Let's look at some different strategies for doing that. First of all, what happens if you increase both s and v? ie. hiring more workers or making the same amount of workers work longer hours. This would increase the total amount of surplus extracted but it wouldn't increase the rate at which surplus was extracted. Still, it would be more profit. Let's look at the "hiring more workers" strategy first. If all capitalists pursued this strategy, pretty soon there would be full employment- and you know what that means.... higher wages because the demand for labor is rising. Higher wages mean an increase in your denominator. Falling rate of exploitation= less profit. Capitalists are always trying to get workers to work longer. I mean, you gotta realize that while your workers are at home sleeping and eating all of your constant capital is just sitting in an empty workplace being totally useless. At that same moment other capitalists are out there pumping out commodities. You can't let them be more efficient/productive than you! Both of these approaches are effective in increasing the total (or absolute) surplus value extracted from workers. In times of expansion in often makes sense to increase outlays on v. But this strategy is much more powerful when combined with a tactic that changes the ratio of S to V. There are many ways to do this. First, you could just pay the workers less, but make them do the same amount of work. This would lower V while keeping S the same, thus raising the rate of exploitation. Capitalists are always finding ways to cut wages. Is there any limit to how low you can set wages? Well, keep this in mind: workers will use their wages to buy food, clothing, housing, entertainment. etc. These things are all necessary in order to keep them alive and healthy enough to come to work each day and create a surplus for you. We call this "reproducing the worker". If you didn't pay them enough to reproduce them, they wouldn't come work for you. The standard of living changes from country to country, so you can always move production to a country where it's cheaper to reproduce the worker. The state is quiet helpful to you in reproducing the worker. In many countries, the state and private charities usually provides a modicum of education and social services so that the poorest of the poor don't starve to death so that you don't have to pay the full cost of reproducing the worker. The credit system performs a similar function. You don't have to pay the full cost of reproducing the worker because workers can just borrow money from banks and go into debt. Once in debt they will be even more tightly chained to the institution of wage labor. (Less)

Channel: youtube

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Message to profiteers of human and non-human exploit...

23,

01:42,

2008-04-26 13:11:16

Description: Message to profiteers of human and non-human exploitation

Channel: youtube

Tags: animal capitalism China exploitation factory farms human industry non-human pharmaceutical Tibet US war

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

DIY exploitation 1 of 2

3,

09:03,

2008-03-18 17:20:21

Description: If you are going to end up with more money than you started with, you are going have to create more value than you pay for in the production process. "Couldn't I just charge more for my (More) If you are going to end up with more money than you started with, you are going have to create more value than you pay for in the production process. "Couldn't I just charge more for my products than it costs me to make them?" Well, not really- you are competing in the marketplace with other capitalists, all of which are trying to lower their prices to out-sell each other, you can't just raise your prices arbitrarily to create profit. Instead of worrying about prices in the marketplace you need to figure out a way to create more value in the production process than you pay for. You have two different types of input: constant and variable capital. Constant capital inputs are incapable of creating more value. That's why we call them constant. Machines, raw materials, factories... as they are used up, these inputs pass on their value to the commodities you produce. There is no way to make them create more value than they are initially worth. Variable capital can create more value than you pay for it. That's because variable capital is human labor. When you pay a worker to work for an hour, you have no idea how much value they are going to produce. They could work hard, or take it easy. They could be productive or unproductive. They can be cheap of expensive to hire. Everything is variable. It will be a constant struggle to figure out the best way to get the most value out of them at the least cost. Sometimes they will even resist. They're a huge pain in the ass but you're going to have to get used to them because this unique variability is what allows you to make a profit at all. So, how exactly do you go about exploiting them? Equation: e=s/v This equation measures the rate of exploitation. In the denominator is the money you have spent on variable capital (wages). In the nominator is the surplus that you the workers produce for you (profit). Workers will work to produce enough value to cover the money you laid out for their wages. The rest of the work the workers do is surplus value- your source of profit. Constant capital (c) is missing from the equation. Constant capital does impart it's value/cost onto the commodities as well but it cannot produce extra surplus. Your goal is to increase e. Let's look at some different strategies for doing that. First of all, what happens if you increase both s and v? ie. hiring more workers or making the same amount of workers work longer hours. This would increase the total amount of surplus extracted but it wouldn't increase the rate at which surplus was extracted. Still, it would be more profit. Let's look at the "hiring more workers" strategy first. If all capitalists pursued this strategy, pretty soon there would be full employment- and you know what that means.... higher wages because the demand for labor is rising. Higher wages mean an increase in your denominator. Falling rate of exploitation= less profit. Capitalists are always trying to get workers to work longer. I mean, you gotta realize that while your workers are at home sleeping and eating all of your constant capital is just sitting in an empty workplace being totally useless. At that same moment other capitalists are out there pumping out commodities. You can't let them be more efficient/productive than you! Both of these approaches are effective in increasing the total (or absolute) surplus value extracted from workers. In times of expansion in often makes sense to increase outlays on v. But this strategy is much more powerful when combined with a tactic that changes the ratio of S to V. There are many ways to do this. First, you could just pay the workers less, but make them do the same amount of work. This would lower V while keeping S the same, thus raising the rate of exploitation. Capitalists are always finding ways to cut wages. Is there any limit to how low you can set wages? Well, keep this in mind: workers will use their wages to buy food, clothing, housing, entertainment. etc. These things are all necessary in order to keep them alive and healthy enough to come to work each day and create a surplus for you. We call this "reproducing the worker". If you didn't pay them enough to reproduce them, they wouldn't come work for you. The standard of living changes from country to country, so you can always move production to a country where it's cheaper to reproduce the worker. The state is quiet helpful to you in reproducing the worker. In many countries, the state and private charities usually provides a modicum of education and social services so that the poorest of the poor don't starve to death so that you don't have to pay the full cost of reproducing the worker. The credit system performs a similar function. You don't have to pay the full cost of reproducing the worker because workers can just borrow money from banks and go into debt. Once in debt they will be even more tightly chained to the institution of wage labor. (Less)

Channel: youtube