copyright Videos - FilesTube Video Search

Search results for copyright

Results 1-15 of about 125167 (Found in 0.104s)

Sort by: Rate Date Views

View:

Le copyright, c'est le Mal la preuve par Disney

74,

10:17,

2008-04-01 12:44:13

Description: Le copyright, c'est le Mal la preuve par Disney

Channel: dailymotion

Tags: Le copyright c'est le Mal la preuve par Disney

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Le copyright, c'est le Mal la preuve par Disney

416,

10:17,

2008-04-01 12:44:24

Description: « Le copyright, c'est le Mal » : la preuve par Disney Des universitaires américains ont voulu démontrer les limites de la notion de droits d'auteur en utilisant des extraits des dessins animés de Walt

Channel: dailymotion

Tags: « Le copyright c'est le Mal » : la preuve par Disney

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

The Disney Trap: How Copyright Steals Our Stories

11:29,

2008-04-17 11:15:06

Description: Imagine you could chat online with Molly Bloom, Joyce's Ulysse's heroine... What would she think about copyright? Find it out in this short film produced by Monica Mazzitelli

Channel: metacafe

Tags: Disney Copyright Copyleft Literature Art Shortfilm

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

14,

05:31,

2008-04-17 11:52:13

Description: This is my power point presentation on Copyright Law.

Channel: metacafe

Tags: Copyright Law Power Point Presentation Computers How

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

09:55,

2008-01-22 16:07:58

Description: The Copyright Cowboy is on the watch for crime, watch out!!!

Channel: youtube

Tags: 2004 Copyright Cowboy film funny ghetto hilarious home improv infringement law parody Part series short sketch video

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

12,

09:58,

2008-01-22 14:38:09

Description: The Copyright Cowboy is at it again! Fighting crime...

Channel: youtube

Tags: 2004 Copyright Cowboy film funny ghetto hilarious home improv infringement law parody Part series short sketch video

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Important Copyright Information for You Tube Users!

09:24,

2007-05-24 11:16:18

Description: Copyright issues affecting You Tube Users are discussed in this informative video to encourage comments and begin to protect our You Tube Community! Mike Mozart, the Toy and Product Guru of the (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: Copy Copyright Fair Help History Law Laws Licensing Parody Problems Questions Resource Right Unfair Unjust Use Video

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Viacom is a Copyright Bully

15,

04:17,

2007-09-01 03:57:27

Description: Viacom is a big, fat copyright bully. To read more about this ridiculous situation with TheKnightShift vs. Viacom, see my blog entry here: (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: copyright disney infringement knight law rant revver shift theknightshift viacom

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

The Purpose of Copyright Law

14,

14:07,

2007-07-29 18:26:54

Description: THE PURPOSE OF COPYRIGHT LAW This is the first in a series of videos that I will be making over the next few weeks discussing copyright law. What is the purpose of copyright law? We must turn to (More) THE PURPOSE OF COPYRIGHT LAW This is the first in a series of videos that I will be making over the next few weeks discussing copyright law. What is the purpose of copyright law? We must turn to Article 1 Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution to find out: http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articlei.html#section8 "The Congress shall have power . . .To promote the progress of science and useful arts, by securing for limited times to authors and inventors the exclusive right to their respective writings and discoveries;" Note that when the Constitution was written, the word "science" was interpreted much more broadly than it is today. In the 1700's, "science" meant generalized knowledge and learning. Thus, the purpose of copyright law as spelled out by the Constitution is to promote the progress of knowledge and learning—not to enrich the creators of new works. Copyright law attempts to achieve these ends by allowing Creators to profit by granting them a monopoly over their works. Copyright law gives authors an incentive to produce more works by granting them exclusive rights in what they produce. However, this protection of the interests of the author is only the MEANS by which the ultimate ENDS of advancing knowledge is promoted. THE ULTIMATE GOAL OF COPYRIGHT LAW IS NOT THE PROTECTION OF THE CREATOR'S INTEREST IN HER WORKS! See Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc. http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/92-1750.ZO.html In Fogerty v. Fantasy, the Supreme Court approvingly cited Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. Aiken: "The limited scope of the copyright holder's statutory monopoly . . . reflects a balance of competing claims upon the public interest: Creative work is to be encouraged and rewarded, but private motivation must ultimately serve the cause of promoting broad public availability of literature, music, and the other arts. The immediate effect of our copyright law is to secure a fair return for an `author's' creative labor. But the ultimate aim is, by this incentive, to stimulate artistic creativity for the general public good." The Court also cited Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service: "The primary objective of copyright is not to reward the labor of authors, but `[t]o promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts.' To this end, copyright assures authors the right to their original expression, but encourages others to build freely upon the ideas and information conveyed by a work." The first Copyright Act (of 1790) in the United States granted only the exclusive right to print, publish, and vend a copyrighted work, and that right was granted for a maximum of 28 years. See: http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/firsts/copyright/ Under the current copyright law, copyright owners also have these rights, plus the right to control the public performances of their works and to control the making of adaptations of their work. And the term of that control has been extended from a maximum of 28 years to 70 years after the death of the author. Why has copyright law been extended far expanded what was imagined by our Founding Fathers? It was expanded at the behest of major copyright-owning industries to protect their cash cows. The publishing industry argued that the greater the monopoly and the protection granted to the authors of copyrighted works, the more incentive they will have to create new works. But this overlooks two factors: 1) Almost all creators build upon the work of others. If copyright law builds too high an obstacle to the use of previous works it will stifle creativity and prevent the creation of new works. 2) The claim that the greater the monopoly granted to the author, the more they will create is not necessarily true. Current copyright law gives the creator a monopoly on his work until 70 years after his death. Does anyone believe that Stephen King would have written fewer books if copyright law only granted creators a monopoly for 28 years? MUST READING: The Purpose of Copyright by Lydia Pallas Loren, Asssociate Professor of Law at Lewis & Clark College http://www.open-spaces.com/article-v2n1-loren.php Professor Loren writes: "In fulfilling the constitutionally mandated goal of copyright law, Congress has had to ask, as one early legislative report did, two questions: "First, how much will the legislation stimulate the producer and so benefit the public; and second, how much will the monopoly granted be detrimental to the public?" As Judge Walker of the Second Circuit recently summarized: "The copyright law seeks to establish a delicate equilibrium. On the one hand, it affords protection to authors as an incentive to create, and, on the other, it must appropriately limit the extent of that protection so as to avoid the effects of monopolistic stagnation." The founding fathers wanted copyright to be a mechanism by which our democracy would grow and flourish - a way in which our storehouse of knowledge is stocked." Loren notes that copyright law has been perverted into a tool for censorship. She cited the case of David Stowe, a professor at Michigan State, who wanted to show how sexism and racism pervaded the big band culture of the 1940s. He wanted to show this by using various cartoons in Downbeat magazine. But the owners of Downbeat refused to grant him permission to use these cartoons at any price because it would make them look bad. Stowe did not want to bear the expense of litigation or run the risk of being found guilty of infringing, so he did not use the cartoons in his study. His academic research was not as rich or complete as it would have been had copyright law not been turned into a tool for censorship. Censorship can occur even under the doctrine of Fair Use, as the Stowe case demonstrates because some may self-censor rather than run the risk of having to defend themselves in potentially costly legislation. But Professor Loren notes that the situation was worsened under the Digital Millenium Copyright Act. She wrote: "The Digital Millennium Copyright Act. . . seriously impedes the access to copyrighted works and the non-copyrighted elements of those works, thereby threatening the ultimate aim of copyright, the promotion of the progress of knowledge and learning. " (Less)

Channel: youtube

Tags: Constitution copyright DMCA fair fathers founding law U.S. use

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Removed Due To Copyright Claim!

04:20,

2008-03-06 08:26:07

Description: Matt & Happy discuss the claims of copyright violations by corporations. Matthew Hawes http://www.thehappyshow.net

Channel: youtube

Tags: copyright Happy Hawes infringement Matt matthawes puppet removal satire Show The thehappyshow Viabom Viacom violation

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Pokemals: The Non-Copyright Infringing Series (Tra

15,

01:55,

2008-04-01 16:47:10

Description: Hello everyone! It's Ejbloo! Months in the making, it's finally here! Pokemals: The Non-Copyright Infringing Series! ...or at least the trailer is finally here. And now for that oh so (More)

Channel: megavideo

Tags: pokemals sometimes abridged non copyright infringing series

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

00:21,

2008-04-18 11:02:42

Description: Matjaž Jurjec Copyright logo

Channel: dailymotion

Tags: copyright logo

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

*Final Update* Letter to New Line Cinema Regarding C...

02:14,

2008-02-13 20:36:34

Description: Update - 2/19/08: I received another message from a representative of New Line. Apparently, the MPAA is behind all of this hubbub. They don't feel the age verification here at YouTube is enough (More) Update - 2/19/08: I received another message from a representative of New Line. Apparently, the MPAA is behind all of this hubbub. They don't feel the age verification here at YouTube is enough to warrant the redband trailer showing. New Line wants the fans to know that they thank them for their interest. As everyone knows, however, rules are rules. I thank New Line for all of their help, and everyone go support Harold and Kumar: Escape from Guantanamo Bay on April 25. Update - 2/14/08: Someone associated with the film contacted me today and told me he agrees with my position on the matter. He also said he would look in to the matter for us. This is regarding the take down of the movie trailer that occured this morning. Song Credit: The Flashbulb: The First Rain and You Letter as Follows: To Whom it May Concern: I just had a video for Harold and Kumar: Escape from Guantanamo Bay (known after as Harold and Kumar 2) removed from YouTube citing copyright violations from New Line Entertainment. Now, although I didn't mean to violate copyright laws, I do believe this is a mistake on the part of New Line Cinema. This is why. The removed video in question was, in fact, a movie trailer. Freely available through the Harold and Kumar 2 website. Many movie websites do not get viewed, as people forget to and/or don't know about the websites. I wanted this movie to be popular, so I uploaded it to YouTube, clearly stating where the clip was from, and providing a hyperlink to the website in the description as a convienience to the viewer. At the time of removal, the trailer had exactly 102,796 individual views, with most of the feedback being positive. This means that, at best, there would be 100,000 of those viewers in the theatres opening weekend. 100,000 tickets, at the average of nine dollars a ticket is 900,000 dollars, a substantial amount to be sure. People watch videos on YouTube for information, in this case, they wanted to see the movie and have a release date. Without this, the losses New Line will suffer could be substantial. If I were to make this removal public, and ask all of the viewers and supporters of the trailer to boycott the theatres the release weekend, there would be substantial losses on New Line Cinema's end. If people really caught on to the injustice of the matter, at best estimates, New Line could lose upwards of $2 Million opening weekend, at the national average of nine dollars a ticket. This is just a movie trailer that is freely available. I could understand if I had uploaded leaked footage from the movie, or even the movie in it's entirety after it were released, but this is really unacceptable, considering the simple fact that I am helping New Line make money for free. However, this could go the other way. New Line could reverse the decision, and word could get out about New Line Cinema's support for the internet community as a whole, thereby boosting sales. If one were to believe that this only works in theory, I beg you to use the band Radiohead's most recent album, In Rainbows, as an example. Released freely available online if the listener pleased, it was later released in stores, debuting at number 1 in the billboard charts, all because the internet demographic will go out and support the "cool" companies, whilst simultaniously boycotting the "totalitarian" ones. Please take all of this in to consideration while deciding to reverse the ban from YouTube. Thank You for Your Time, Patrick Lozano (Less)

Channel: youtube

Tags: and Bay Cho Copyright Guantanamo Harold Infringement John Kal Kumar Penn

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

01:20,

2007-09-08 22:39:54

Description: This video brilliantly explains copyright law, and why it shouldn't apply to anime on youtube. It's titled Copyright Isn't Copyrighted, with audio by DJ Shpadoinkle. (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: amv anime copyright copyrighted full isn't law metal panic

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Formal Introduction & Copyright Issues

10:53,

2006-09-27 17:52:38

Description: My formal introduction followed by my take on YouTube's copyright law issues. To make my formal introduction feel more natural, this video was made "Unplugged": By this, I mean no (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: bdo budwheizzah copyright introduction television

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here