cdesign Videos - FilesTube Video Search

cdesign proponentsists-the case against "Intelligent...

16,

06:47,

2007-11-14 05:02:55

Description: In 2004, the Dover school board ordered science teachers to read a statement to high school biology students suggesting that there is an alternative to Darwin's theory of evolution called (More)

Channel: youtube

Tags: cdesign christian creationism design hypocrites ID intelligent jesus liars proponentsists zealots

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Temoignages client C-DESIGN Fashion - Société LAUR...

137,

05:02,

2008-04-01 12:44:52

Description: Ils utilisent C-DESIGN Fashion® depuis plusieurs années. Que pensent-ils de C-DESIGN Fashion®? ils ont souhaité vous faire part de leur expérience du logiciel C-DESIGN Fashion®. Après avoir créé de

Channel: dailymotion

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Temoignages client C-DESIGN Fashion- Société MIM

87,

05:58,

2008-04-01 12:44:58

Description: Ils utilisent C-DESIGN Fashion® depuis plusieurs années. Que pensent-ils de C-DESIGN Fashion®? ils ont souhaité vous faire part de leur expérience du logiciel C-DESIGN Fashion®. Après avoir créé de

Channel: dailymotion

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Temoignages client C-DESIGN Fashion - Société ASTUCES

94,

04:40,

2008-04-01 12:45:54

Description: Ils utilisent C-DESIGN Fashion® depuis plusieurs années. Que pensent-ils de C-DESIGN Fashion®? ils ont souhaité vous faire part de leur expérience du logiciel C-DESIGN Fashion®. Après avoir créé de

Channel: dailymotion

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Intelligent Design = Creationism: The Missing Link

14,

04:44,

2008-01-17 12:23:44

Description: An explanation of evidence that was used in the Dover Intelligent Design trial to show that Intelligent Design equals Creationism, and is therefore unscientific and unconstitutional. The segment is (More) An explanation of evidence that was used in the Dover Intelligent Design trial to show that Intelligent Design equals Creationism, and is therefore unscientific and unconstitutional. The segment is from the Nova special "Judgement Day: Intelligent Design on Trial" which aired in November 2007. Text overlays have been added here. For further information, or to view or purchase the program online, visit the PBS/Nova website: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/ For more information about the trial, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District --- NARRATOR: If they could show Pandas started out as a creationist book, that would suggest intelligent design is simply creationism repackaged and therefore inherently religious. Matzke emailed this information to Eric Rothschild, who immediately issued a subpoena to the publisher of Pandas for any drafts the book went through before printing. In a few months, they received two boxes of material. The lawyers sent them to Barbara Forrest. A philosophy professor and author who has been tracking intelligent design for years, she was scheduled to testify in the trial. BARBARA FORREST: Oh, my goodness, those two boxes contained about 7,000 pieces of paper. I had to sit down with those documents and just start flipping through them, which is what I did day and night. NARRATOR: After much digging, she hit pay dirt. Buried in these documents were two drafts of Pandas straddling the 1987 case of Edwards versus Aguillard, in which the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to teach creationism in public school science class. One draft was written before the case and the other revised just after. BARBARA FORREST: In the first 1987 draft, which is the pre-Edwards draft, the definition of creation reads this way "Creation means that various forms of life began abruptly, through the agency of an intelligent creator, with their distinctive features already intact: fish with fins and scales, birds with feathers, beaks and wings, et cetera." The same definition in this draft, after the Edwards decision, reads this way: "Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency, with their distinctive features already intact: fish with fins and scales, birds with feathers, beaks, et cetera." Same definition, just one is worded in terms of creationism, the other one worded in terms of intelligent design. NICK MATZKE: Everyone said intelligent design is creationism re-labeled. Never in our wildest dreams, though, did we think that this would actually be recorded in paper in a way that could be documented in a court case. ERIC ROTHSCHILD: And that became probably our best single piece of evidence at trial. NARRATOR: Barbara Forrest's testimony would make a strong case that the Dover school board was thrusting religion into the classroom. And in comparing the Of Pandas and People drafts, Forrest discovered that the authors had apparently made their revisions in haste. BARBARA FORREST: In cleansing this manuscript, they failed to replace every word properly. I found the word "creationists." And instead of replacing the entire word, they just kind of did this, and got "design proponents" with the "c" in front and the "ists" in the back from the original word. NICK MATZKE: So the correct term for this transitional form is "Cdesign proponentsists." And everyone now refers to this as the "missing link" between creationism and intelligent design. You've got the direct physical evidence there of a transitional fossil. NARRATOR: Barbara Forrest's testimony not only traced the creationist lineage of Pandas. Citing a Christian magazine's interview, Forrest let one of the intelligent design movement's own leaders, Paul Nelson, speak for himself. BARBARA FORREST: The question he was asked was, "Is intelligent design just a critique of evolutionary theory or does it offer something more? Does it offer something that humankind needs to know?" This is his answer: "Easily, the biggest challenge facing the I.D. community is to develop a full-fledged theory of biological design. We don't have such a theory right now, and that's a real problem. Without a theory, it's very hard to know where to direct your research focus. Right now, we've got a bag of powerful intuitions and a handful of notions, such as irreducible complexity, but as yet, no general theory of biological design." WITOLD "VIC" WALCZAK: The evidence she bought into that courtroom really exposed the hypocrisy of the intelligent design movement in a way that's irrefutable. You know, she used their own language, things that they had written and said, to show that they themselves knew that this isn't science. --- (Less)

Channel: youtube

Tags: CdesignProponentsist Creationism Darwin Day Design Dover Evolution Intelligent Judgement Kitzmiller Nova PBS Science

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Intelligent Design = Creationism: The Missing Link

7,

04:44,

2008-04-21 18:47:50

Description: An explanation of evidence that was used in the Dover Intelligent Design trial to show that Intelligent Design equals Creationism, and is therefore unscientific and unconstitutional. The segment is (More) An explanation of evidence that was used in the Dover Intelligent Design trial to show that Intelligent Design equals Creationism, and is therefore unscientific and unconstitutional. The segment is from the Nova special "Judgement Day: Intelligent Design on Trial" which aired in November 2007. Text overlays have been added here. For further information, or to view or purchase the program online, visit the PBS/Nova website: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/id/ For more information about the trial, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kitzmiller_v._Dover_Area_School_District --- NARRATOR: If they could show Pandas started out as a creationist book, that would suggest intelligent design is simply creationism repackaged and therefore inherently religious. Matzke emailed this information to Eric Rothschild, who immediately issued a subpoena to the publisher of Pandas for any drafts the book went through before printing. In a few months, they received two boxes of material. The lawyers sent them to Barbara Forrest. A philosophy professor and author who has been tracking intelligent design for years, she was scheduled to testify in the trial. BARBARA FORREST: Oh, my goodness, those two boxes contained about 7,000 pieces of paper. I had to sit down with those documents and just start flipping through them, which is what I did day and night. NARRATOR: After much digging, she hit pay dirt. Buried in these documents were two drafts of Pandas straddling the 1987 case of Edwards versus Aguillard, in which the Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional to teach creationism in public school science class. One draft was written before the case and the other revised just after. BARBARA FORREST: In the first 1987 draft, which is the pre-Edwards draft, the definition of creation reads this way "Creation means that various forms of life began abruptly, through the agency of an intelligent creator, with their distinctive features already intact: fish with fins and scales, birds with feathers, beaks and wings, et cetera." The same definition in this draft, after the Edwards decision, reads this way: "Intelligent design means that various forms of life began abruptly through an intelligent agency, with their distinctive features already intact: fish with fins and scales, birds with feathers, beaks, et cetera." Same definition, just one is worded in terms of creationism, the other one worded in terms of intelligent design. NICK MATZKE: Everyone said intelligent design is creationism re-labeled. Never in our wildest dreams, though, did we think that this would actually be recorded in paper in a way that could be documented in a court case. ERIC ROTHSCHILD: And that became probably our best single piece of evidence at trial. NARRATOR: Barbara Forrest's testimony would make a strong case that the Dover school board was thrusting religion into the classroom. And in comparing the Of Pandas and People drafts, Forrest discovered that the authors had apparently made their revisions in haste. BARBARA FORREST: In cleansing this manuscript, they failed to replace every word properly. I found the word "creationists." And instead of replacing the entire word, they just kind of did this, and got "design proponents" with the "c" in front and the "ists" in the back from the original word. NICK MATZKE: So the correct term for this transitional form is "Cdesign proponentsists." And everyone now refers to this as the "missing link" between creationism and intelligent design. You've got the direct physical evidence there of a transitional fossil. NARRATOR: Barbara Forrest's testimony not only traced the creationist lineage of Pandas. Citing a Christian magazine's interview, Forrest let one of the intelligent design movement's own leaders, Paul Nelson, speak for himself. BARBARA FORREST: The question he was asked was, "Is intelligent design just a critique of evolutionary theory or does it offer something more? Does it offer something that humankind needs to know?" This is his answer: "Easily, the biggest challenge facing the I.D. community is to develop a full-fledged theory of biological design. We don't have such a theory right now, and that's a real problem. Without a theory, it's very hard to know where to direct your research focus. Right now, we've got a bag of powerful intuitions and a handful of notions, such as irreducible complexity, but as yet, no general theory of biological design." WITOLD "VIC" WALCZAK: The evidence she bought into that courtroom really exposed the hypocrisy of the intelligent design movement in a way that's irrefutable. You know, she used their own language, things that they had written and said, to show that they themselves knew that this isn't science. --- (Less)

Channel: youtube

Tags: CdesignProponentsist Creationism Darwin Day Design Dover Evolution Intelligent Judgement Kitzmiller Nova PBS Science

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

cdesign proponentsists-the case against "Intelligent...

21,

06:47,

2008-04-03 05:58:56

Description: In 2004, the Dover school board ordered science teachers to read a statement to high school biology students suggesting that there is an alternative to Darwin's theory of evolution called intelligent

Channel: youtube

Tags: cdesign proponentsists ID creationism intelligent design christian liars hypocrites zealots jesus

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Cdesign proponetsist's

11,

04:44,

2008-04-03 05:58:56

Description: ID = Creationism

Channel: youtube

Tags: cdesignproponetsist ID evolution dover cdesign liars for christ

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

CDesign Fonográfico

6,

03:38,

2008-04-03 05:58:56

Description: a história de como surgiu a empresa

Channel: youtube

Tags: cdesign

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

cdesign proponentsists - The missing link

11,

02:29,

2008-04-03 05:58:56

Description: From the PBS documentary about Kitzmiller v. Dover School Board, this is the story of the evolution of the text book Of Pandas and People from a book which taught creationism to a book which taught in

Channel: youtube

Tags: intelligent design creationism evolution pbs dover kitzmiller

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Richard Dawkins and P.Z. Myers on Expelled

17,

09:30,

2008-04-03 05:58:56

Description: Richard Dawkins and P.Z. Myers talk about their experience trying to go to a screening of Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed. http://richarddawkins.net/article,2389,n,n

Channel: youtube

Tags: Dawkins Pharyngula PZ Myers ID Creationism cdesign proponentsist Expelled No Intelligence Allowed Irony

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

PZ Myers Expelled from conference call by creationists

14,

03:43,

2008-04-03 05:58:56

Description: PZ Myers scientific criticism of ID is EXPELLED from conf. call Thanks to Rebecca Watson for recording: http://skepchick.org/blog/?p=1190 thanks to PZ Myers for providing two of the funniest moments

Channel: youtube

Tags: morons pz myers expelled liars for christ cdesign proponentsists ben stein IDiots discovery institute lie lying ironic

Rate:

Add to quicklist

Watch here

Creationism, Design, God and Toes

16,

03:06,

2008-03-17 19:30:08

Description: Random thought of the day: Why are toes useful as distinct digits? Why not have them fused/webbed into one body part instead? This would result in lower surface area and lower heat loss - very useful (More)

Channel: youtube