Search results for LAV-III
Results 1-15 of about 57 (Found in 0.400s)
13,
07:56,
2007-04-30 21:59:10
Description: Nomorenarcissism
PBS documentary shows a Canadian PRT team at an isolated FOB in Afghanistan trying to win over a nearby village from Taliban rebel sympathy by repairing their water pumps and (More) Nomorenarcissism
PBS documentary shows a Canadian PRT team at an isolated FOB in Afghanistan trying to win over a nearby village from Taliban rebel sympathy by repairing their water pumps and supplying other needed items. "The kingdom is lost for want of a nail" when the native contracted supply column is turned away because the bomb sniffing dog discovers a driver has traces of explosives. Why OPSEC is violated by having locals drive supplies to FOBs in the first place? Thus, they cannot get measley spark plugs and LAV-III/Stryker clusterfuck drive into a run-down road-side black market where their "shooter" foot narcissists hop out and proceed to "block" the road by NOT blocking it as if Afghans who have lived with guns for centuries are going to cower at them brandishing firearms. When Afghans continue to drive because the Canadians didn't even post traffic cones, they eagerly open fire with "warning shots"...even when moving the fragile truck force resorts to gunplay because they don't feel safe in their allegedly "armored" LAV3Strykers spitting out warning shots left and right and causing a truck to over-turn and nearly killing an innocent Afghan.
This non-road block incompetence is practiced by DAMF American punks in Iraq, too:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAJ46Wosrn0
A "pound-of-cure" MEDEVAC helicopter is flown in to fly him out, but the "ounce of preventable" damage is already done. So much for "winning hearts and minds" this day. Emasculated ground troops in wheeled LAV-III/Stryker trucks are set up for road/trail restricted failure wherever they are. How many spark plugs or even brand new water pumps do you think could have been purchased for the cost of avoiding the UH-60 Blackhawk MEDEVAC helicopter flight?
Why not send a LAV-III ambulance if they are sooo land-mine "protected" as their liar proponents say? Ask this Canadian Medic's family:
http://www.herofund.ca/?cat=74
Name: Master Corporal Christian Duchesne
Age:34
Died: August 22, 2007
Hometown: Montreal, Quebec
Children: Three daughters
Unit : 5th Field Ambulance (Valcartier, Quebec)
Master Corporal Christian Duchesne was a member of the 5th Field Ambulance, based at Valcartier, Quebec. Duchesne was killed when his armoured, LAV-III vehicle struck an improvised explosive device in southern Afghanistan. (Less) Channel: youtube
31,
07:51,
2007-04-30 21:36:00
Description: Nomorenarcissism
PBS Documentary Afghanistan: The Other War reveals that the emasculation of western armies into wheeled trucks like the LAV-III/Stryker to not LOOK war-like (ie; look less capable, (More) Nomorenarcissism
PBS Documentary Afghanistan: The Other War reveals that the emasculation of western armies into wheeled trucks like the LAV-III/Stryker to not LOOK war-like (ie; look less capable, which they are) cannot even overcome the battle against earth terrain to have basic mobility to reach people in closed terrains in jeopardy at the hands of sub-national groups rebelling against the nation-state. You look less capable means you ARE less capable and being weak with a "glass jaw" neither protects the good civilians nor engenders respect from the enemy. "Nation-building" in war zones in wheeled trucks is a disaster.
Also telling is the Canadian Multi-National Force Commander's obsession with self; who cares how history will judge him? The Mission and the Men should come before "Me". By being in road-bound wheeled trucks, the NATO MN forces have a "glass jaw" that makes it impossible to "turn- the-other-cheek" so they are trigger-happy trying to use firepower to compensate for a lack of M113 Gavin-type tracked cross-country mobility (avoid road troubles in first place) and armored protection. When NATO forces are caught red-handed needlessly killing Afghan civilians, as a Cover-Your-Ass (CYA) politician--maybe without a technotactical grasp of what his subordinates are doing--he gives the standard c'est la guerre (it is war, blame it not our incompetence or willful wrong-doing) excuses sure to infuriate the people whom we want to stay out of the Taliban's camp. He offers that the Soldiers might be court-martialed but he doesn't show any grasp that he has them in bad situations setting them up for such failures; for example they live in exposed tents when they should be in dug-in and Hesco-covered ISO shipping container "BATTLEBOXes" at their forward operating bases (FOBs).
http://www.geocities.com/strategicmaneuver/battleboxes.htm
Hopefully, he and others will watch this PBS video and realize they need to hand out bright-orange traffic cones or saw horses so his troops can start actually visibly marking impromptu road blocks (place a sign on one of the cones/saw horses saying "STOP!" in the local language) at THE PROPER DISTANCE TO GIVE CAR BOMB STAND-OFF PROTECTION and stop the gleeful "warning shot" BS which lets cars/trucks get too close in the first place and results in needless dead/wounded innocent civilians. Or do we want an excuse to open fire and kill "ragheads"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAJ46Wosrn0
...confirming we are just there to take their oil/natural resources:
http://www.combatreform.com/militarismsucks.htm
...or do we want to do what's morally RIGHT and technotactically BEST to protect our troops and avoid misunderstandings that kill innocent civilians and feed the rebellion? For all the $$$ millions going into sexy helicopters to fly him around, surely he can afford some traffic cones/saw horses? Or some spark plugs? (see part 2). Watching the PBS video may not make these lessons obvious; maybe he and other decision-makers will read our captions here and follow the lead of the British and Dutch and re-equip ALL NATO forces with M113 Gavin or other type light tracks since Afghanistan's terrain is traversable by these low ground-pressure vehicles and not wheeled trucks with any armor protection.
http://www.geocities.com/wheelsvstracks
The Canadians to their credit, have since this video factored in their constant LAV3Stryker truck failures in Afghanistan and turned more and more to tracked vehicles.
Its clear that to do SASO/COIN operations properly, we need a dedicated non-linear, battlefield stability corps composed of older, more mature, psychologically-screened to not be narcissist "shooters" properly equipped with light M113 Gavin armored tracks, affordable 2-seat observation/attack fixed-wing STOL aircraft to scour the skies 24/7/365 and not constantly crash like UAVs do and see hiding enemies with human eyesight plus sensorary help---and plenty of combat engineers to repair the country's infrastructure and separation wall apart warring factions and security fence trouble-makers out.
http://www.combatreform2.com/johnpaulvann.htm
No one has to be a victim of something in order to condemn it. Do you have to take LSD to know its wrong?
No.
Do you have to be a military victim overseas to know its wrong to occupy countries that do not belong to you?
No. (Less) Channel: youtube
8,
07:51,
2008-04-22 09:05:27
Description: Nomorenarcissism PBS Documentary Afghanistan: The Other War reveals that the emasculation of western armies into wheeled trucks like the LAV-III/Stryker to not LOOK war-like (ie; look less capable, (More) Nomorenarcissism PBS Documentary Afghanistan: The Other War reveals that the emasculation of western armies into wheeled trucks like the LAV-III/Stryker to not LOOK war-like (ie; look less capable, which they are) cannot even overcome the battle against earth terrain to have basic mobility to reach people in closed terrains in jeopardy at the hands of sub-national groups rebelling against the nation-state. You look less capable means you ARE less capable and being weak with a "glass jaw" neither protects the good civilians nor engenders respect from the enemy. "Nation-building" in war zones in wheeled trucks is a disaster. Also telling is the Canadian Multi-National Force Commander's obsession with self; who cares how history will judge him? The Mission and the Men should come before "Me". By being in road-bound wheeled trucks, the NATO MN forces have a "glass jaw" that makes it impossible to "turn- the-other-cheek" so they are trigger-happy trying to use firepower to compensate for a lack of M113 Gavin-type tracked cross-country mobility (avoid road troubles in first place) and armored protection. When NATO forces are caught red-handed needlessly killing Afghan civilians, as a Cover-Your-Ass (CYA) politician--maybe without a technotactical grasp of what his subordinates are doing--he gives the standard c'est la guerre (it is war, blame it not our incompetence or willful wrong-doing) excuses sure to infuriate the people whom we want to stay out of the Taliban's camp. He offers that the Soldiers might be court-martialed but he doesn't show any grasp that he has them in bad situations setting them up for such failures; for example they live in exposed tents when they should be in dug-in and Hesco-covered ISO shipping container "BATTLEBOXes" at their forward operating bases (FOBs). http://www.geocities.com/strategicmaneuver/battleboxes.htm Hopefully, he and others will watch this PBS video and realize they need to hand out bright-orange traffic cones or saw horses so his troops can start actually visibly marking impromptu road blocks (place a sign on one of the cones/saw horses saying "STOP!" in the local language) at THE PROPER DISTANCE TO GIVE CAR BOMB STAND-OFF PROTECTION and stop the gleeful "warning shot" BS which lets cars/trucks get too close in the first place and results in needless dead/wounded innocent civilians. Or do we want an excuse to open fire and kill "ragheads" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAJ46Wosrn0 ...confirming we are just there to take their oil/natural resources: http://www.combatreform.com/militarismsucks.htm ...or do we want to do what's morally RIGHT and technotactically BEST to protect our troops and avoid misunderstandings that kill innocent civilians and feed the rebellion? For all the $$$ millions going into sexy helicopters to fly him around, surely he can afford some traffic cones/saw horses? Or some spark plugs? (see part 2). Watching the PBS video may not make these lessons obvious; maybe he and other decision-makers will read our captions here and follow the lead of the British and Dutch and re-equip ALL NATO forces with M113 Gavin or other type light tracks since Afghanistan's terrain is traversable by these low ground-pressure vehicles and not wheeled trucks with any armor protection. http://www.geocities.com/wheelsvstracks The Canadians to their credit, have since this video factored in their constant LAV3Stryker truck failures in Afghanistan and turned more and more to tracked vehicles. Its clear that to do SASO/COIN operations properly, we need a dedicated non-linear, battlefield stability corps composed of older, more mature, psychologically-screened to not be narcissist "shooters" properly equipped with light M113 Gavin armored tracks, affordable 2-seat observation/attack fixed-wing STOL aircraft to scour the skies 24/7/365 and not constantly crash like UAVs do and see hiding enemies with human eyesight plus sensorary help---and plenty of combat engineers to repair the country's infrastructure and separation wall apart warring factions and security fence trouble-makers out. http://www.combatreform2.com/johnpaulvann.htm No one has to be a victim of something in order to condemn it. Do you have to take LSD to know its wrong? No. Do you have to be a military victim overseas to know its wrong to occupy countries that do not belong to you? No. (Less) Channel: youtube
15,
00:12,
2007-04-01 08:22:30
Description: Nomorenarcissism
From the recent PBS documentary, "Afghanistan: the Other War"
Go to 2:58 and see why the Canadians have gone to tracks in Afghanistan like other smart armies, Brits, (More) Nomorenarcissism
From the recent PBS documentary, "Afghanistan: the Other War"
Go to 2:58 and see why the Canadians have gone to tracks in Afghanistan like other smart armies, Brits, Dutch etc.
Canadian LAV-IIIs hopelessly stuck in mud, breaks main bearing, mission aborted
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXFMix3dudU
What the LAV3Stryker narcissist racketeers don't want you to know is that they have to pamper their trucks and avoid uneven and soft terrain lest they get stuck and ridiculed by their peers or incinerated by their enemies. While they boast of "road speed" they conveniently don't tell you that constant land mine and car bomb detonations await their flat-bottoms ON THE ROADS resulting in heavy casualties for the mere token 309 strykertrucks in Iraq trying to hide amongst the over 2, 000 tracked M113 Gavins, M2 Bradleys and M1 Abrams doing the actual heavy combat operations with cross-country and rumble-over-rubble mobility.
http://www.geocities.com/wheelsvstracks
Adding to the list of motorized lame infantry sorrows are never ending "discoveries" of fatal flaws in the air-filled rubber-tired LAV-type egowagon. You see an early LAV-1 getting stuck here, the LAV-III/Stryker truck is even MORE BLOATED AND HEAVY!
http://eureferendum2.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html
"The Light Armoured Vehicle (LAV) - as it is known -is a 'conventional' wheeled armoured vehicle, one designed for the European battlefield. Its fatal weakness - in common with most vehicles of the type - is that it is not designed to be operated in a fully closed down condition for long periods of time. Visibility is restricted and crew comfort (especially when it is hot) suffers. By any measure, this equipment is far from ideal for use as convoy escorts or as patrols in counter-insurgency operations."
In fact, the "New" LAV3Stryker wheeled infantry wagon dates back to 1954: a competent U.S. Army rejected it 53 years ago!
http://www.combatreform.com/usarmyrejectedLAV3STRYKERmotorizedtrucksin1954.jpg
Page 77 of Hunnicutt's book "Bradley: a History of American Fighting and Support Vehicles" shows the post-Korean war U.S. Army considered wheeled tin cans to motorize troops along with cross-country-mobile tracks. The "revolutionary", "new" road-bound wheels were rejected and M113 Gavin tracks were built; 57 years of combat success has followed ever since. Those that say LAV3/Strykers are "newer" are incompetent ignorants of armored vehicle history or willing liars.
Narcissism and corporate greed run (ruin) the U.S. military...the USMC internally knows their LAV-1s are crap yet refuses to admit it in public lest their weak egos get bruised and said nothing when Shinseki started to buy LAV-IIIs (so much for loyalty to America and the other services) and have lusted to buy more LAVs since their thin steel boxes are corroding and cracking when not being burned through by landmines and RPGs in Iraq. Their egoracket falsade must be maintained at all costs! Form before function! Image before reality! Status quo before victory! Blame the politicians for our failures!
If you buy into the Canadian-made Stryker wheeled truck created by the liberal, big-government Clinton administration to do feel-good nation-building that is killing/maiming our Soldiers, that makes you a liberal, doesn't it?
These poor Canadian LAV-III Soldiers are just plain DEAD:
Liars say road-bound LAV-IIIs protect against land mines: Quebec Soldier Killed as Result
http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=b002bedc-45bb-4...
Private Simon Longtin first Van Doo killed in Afghanistan
Andrew Mayeda, CanWest News Service
Published: Sunday, August 19, 2007
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan -- Quebec's storied Van Doos regiment is mourning its first loss in Afghanistan after a young private who arrived in the country only three weeks ago was killed by a roadside bomb.
Pte. Simon Longtin, 23, was travelling in a LAV-III armoured vehicle when it struck an improvised explosive device.
http://www.herofund.ca/?cat=74
Name: Master Corporal Christian Duchesne
Age:34
Died: August 22, 2007
Hometown: Montreal, Quebec
Children: Three daughters
Unit : 5th Field Ambulance (Valcartier, Quebec)
Master Corporal Christian Duchesne was a member of the 5th Field Ambulance, based at Valcartier, Quebec. Duchesne was killed when his armoured, LAV-III vehicle struck an improvised explosive device in southern Afghanistan.
For a sampling of all the U.S. Army LAV-III/Stryker and USMC LAV-1 needless dead:
http://www.combatreform.com/strykerhorrors.htm (Less) Channel: youtube
0,
07:14,
2009-01-22 02:37:31
Description: The video shows Fort Lewis, Washington where the weak wheeled LAV-III/Stryker victim-infantry plays with civilian re-enactors. Bush/Cheney's words about America not occupying a country and (More) The video shows Fort Lewis, Washington where the weak wheeled LAV-III/Stryker victim-infantry plays with civilian re-enactors. Bush/Cheney's words about America not occupying a country and imposing our politics is quite hilarious since they just said those things to get elected. Once in power, Bush/Cheney became the biggest occupation racketeers $$$ of all time, ever.
http://www.combatreform.com/militarismsucks.htm
What America needs is a specialized CORPS---not the entire force---optimized to handle sub-national conflicts (SNCs) while the main body stays focused on nation-state wars (NSWs). Its ironic that they cite Gettysburg—when this was a battle that should have been AVOIDED; Confederate General Robert E. Lee should have not attacked the Union Forces already there holding the high ground with Colonel Joshua Lawrence Chamberlains 20th Maine holding the critical right flank---thanks to Bufords CAVALRY. Lee attacked because his force was composed of weak ego southern rednecks who saw war as a form of manhood proving-exercise and couldnt resist the temptation to showboat with their lives in vain glory. Like todays malignant, light infantry narcissists who cannot say no! to riding around in wheeled trucks!
http://www.combatreform.com/armoredhmmwvsstrykerssuck.htm
So what America should be doing in the 21st Century is avoid getting worn-out in futile occupations--regardless how lucrative for military bureaucracies and defense contractors for cash $$$ and careers—as retired Army Colonel Douglas Macgregor points out on his web site:
http://www.douglasmacgregor.com (Less) Channel: youtube
19,
05:40,
2007-04-13 09:27:30
Description: Nomorenarcissism
WARNING: propaganda video with corrections. LAV-1/3/Stryker trucks are flawed road-bound, flat-bottomed deathtraps that lines the pockets of Army and marine officers/enlistedmen so (More) Nomorenarcissism
WARNING: propaganda video with corrections. LAV-1/3/Stryker trucks are flawed road-bound, flat-bottomed deathtraps that lines the pockets of Army and marine officers/enlistedmen so they don't have to get a real job after leaving the service with a comfy lifetime of retirement benefits. To those that have to ride in them and die horribly driving into landmines on roads they cannot avoid due to a lack of cross-country mobility, they con them with how fashionably "hi tech" and comfortable they will look before being burned up into a body bag.
http://www.combatreform.com/strykerhorrors.htm
http://www.geocities.com/armorhistory/infantrytanks.htm
Look at the recent PBS documentary, "Afghanistan: the Other War", Go to 2:58 and see why the Canadians have gone to tracks in Afghanistan like other smarter armies, Brits, Dutch etc. Canadian LAV-IIIs hopelessly stuck in mud, breaks main bearing, mission aborted
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXFMix3dudU
In fact, the "New" LAV3Stryker wheeled infantry wagon dates back to 1954: a competent U.S. Army rejected it 53 years ago!
http://www.combatreform.com/usarmyrejectedLAV3STRYKERmotorizedtrucksin1954.jpg
Page 77 of Hunnicutt's book "Bradley: a History of American Fighting and Support Vehicles" shows the post-Korean war U.S. Army considered wheeled tin cans to motorize troops along with cross-country-mobile tracks. The "revolutionary", "new" road-bound wheels were rejected and M113 Gavin tracks were built; 57 years of combat success has followed ever since. Those that say LAV3/Strykers are "newer" are incompetent ignorants of armored vehicle history or willing liars.
Even if you are not immediately incinerated killed or maimed, being constantly ambushed by the enemy because your wheeled truck cannot leave roads/trails/streets is damaging to us. Taxpayers hurt. Enemy happy. Civilians see Americans cannot defend themselves much less them.
What matters in war is VICTORY--not prolonged operations however "brilliantly executed" (Sun Tzu said this--but since when do light infantry narcissists READ or THINK? Why bother listing sources?)
If we go broke operating easily ambushed wheeled trucks we will be forced to leave Iraq as surely as being defeated in a WW2-style pitched battle.
If you buy into the Canadian-made Stryker wheeled truck created by the liberal, big-government Clinton administration to do feel-good nation-building that is killing/maiming our Soldiers, that makes you a liberal, doesn't it?
These poor Canadian LAV-III Soldiers are just plain DEAD:
Liars say road-bound LAV-IIIs protect against land mines: Quebec Soldier Killed as Result
http://www.nationalpost.com/story.html?id=b002bedc-45bb-4...
Private Simon Longtin first Van Doo killed in Afghanistan
Andrew Mayeda, CanWest News Service
Published: Sunday, August 19, 2007
KANDAHAR, Afghanistan -- Quebec's storied Van Doos regiment is mourning its first loss in Afghanistan after a young private who arrived in the country only three weeks ago was killed by a roadside bomb.
Pte. Simon Longtin, 23, was travelling in a LAV-III armoured vehicle when it struck an improvised explosive device.
http://www.herofund.ca/?cat=74
Name: Master Corporal Christian Duchesne
Age:34
Died: August 22, 2007
Hometown: Montreal, Quebec
Children: Three daughters
Unit : 5th Field Ambulance (Valcartier, Quebec)
Master Corporal Christian Duchesne was a member of the 5th Field Ambulance, based at Valcartier, Quebec. Duchesne was killed when his armoured, LAV-III vehicle struck an improvised explosive device in southern Afghanistan.
For a sampling of all the U.S. Army LAV-III/Stryker and USMC LAV-1 needless dead:
http://www.combatreform.com/strykerhorrors.htm (Less) Channel: youtube
2,
02:50,
2008-04-21 21:56:32
Description: stab run recorded from the back of our LAV III at the end of our gunners course, showing the 25mm cannon busting some ass. canadian forces. 2PPCLI
Channel: youtube
0,
00:00,
2009-01-28 18:48:26
Description: Before Christmas I was on the Lav Driver Course ... sweet vehicle...
Channel: livevideo
19,
07:53,
2007-04-30 22:37:32
Description: Nomorenarcissism
Video begins with the PRT female officer explaining the need to win over the villagers to a smartass kill/capture enlisted narcissist obsessed with the "Taliban all (More) Nomorenarcissism
Video begins with the PRT female officer explaining the need to win over the villagers to a smartass kill/capture enlisted narcissist obsessed with the "Taliban all around". By conveniently being in wheeled LAV3/Strykers without cross-country mobility he is exempt from having to patrol or set up LP/OPs to scour the immediate area of his own FOB of Taliban asking for a M16 vs AK47 firefight. What he can do when not sharpshooting his officers is play kill/capture on a laptop as his buddy nearby is doing. Me thinks he could better spend his time making some "STOP!" signs in the local Afghan language to bolster impromptu road blocks and prevent the need to "bust caps" into civilians. At 2: 58 yet another LAV3/Stryker clusterfuck convoy is sent down the road hit by a little rain to make contact with another village to win them over when they can't even keep their promises to their first village adjacent to their FOB. A LAV3Stryker gets stuck in a little mud ON THE ROAD and breaks its main bearing. While their officer spins a tail almost as fast as the rubber tires are in the deepening mud, the mission is ABORTED. The "recovery" LAV3Stryker yanks out the first truck but its hitched up to a regular LAV3Stryker to tow back to base. Then as the pair start to move--THEY BOTH GET STUCK in a minor mud rut that would be nothing for a light M113 Gavin armored track to drive through without even stopping to blink. With darkness falling, they need to get back to base before the Taliban come out; the NCOIC walks away in disgust he's been given crap wheeled vehicles to work with. In fact, the "New" LAV3Stryker wheeled infantry wagon dates back to 1954: a competent U.S. Army rejected it 53 years ago!
http://www.combatreform.com/usarmyrejectedLAV3STRYKERmotorizedtrucksin1954.jpg
Page 77 of Hunnicutt's book "Bradley: a History of American Fighting and Support Vehicles" shows the post-Korean war U.S. Army considered wheeled tin cans to motorize troops along with cross-country-mobile tracks. The "revolutionary", "new" road-bound wheels were rejected and M113 Gavin tracks were built; 57 years of combat success has followed ever since. Those that say LAV3/Strykers are "newer" are incompetent ignorants of armored vehicle history or willing liars.
This Canadian Medic wasn't as lucky as the PRT in the video; he was killed in a Road-Bound LAV-III truck deathtrap ambulance
How will an ambulance rescue anyone if its in flames itself?
http://www.herofund.ca/?cat=74
Duchesne was killed when his armoured, LAV-III vehicle struck an improvised explosive device in southern Afghanistan.
http://oruzgan.web-log.nl/uruzgan_weblog/canada/index.html
"The deadly roadside bombs have killed 22 of the 26 Canadian Soldiers who have died in Afghanistan over the past six months.
But tanks tend not to be the target of choice for the Taliban because of the protection they offer to those inside.
Lt.-Col. Stephane Lafaut, the incoming commander of the Operational Mentoring and Liaison Team in Afghanistan, said Tuesday that IEDs tend to be used more by the Taliban to target other vehicles -- such as Canada's LAV3, Nyala and Bison armoured vehicles -- instead of tanks."
http://www.herofund.ca/?cat=51
Name: Private David Robert Greenslade
Died: April 8, 2007
Age: 20
Hometown: Saint-John, New Brunswick
Children: none
Unit : 2nd Battalion, The Royal Canadian Regiment, (Gagetown, New Brunswick)
Private Greenslade was killed with five other Canadian Soldiers, when their LAV-III armored vehicle hit a roadside bomb. Greenslade was a member of the 2nd Battalion, Royal Canadian Regiment.
Fortunately, the PRT survives their wheeled immobility debacle and ask the nearby villagers to WALK TO THEM at the FOB to receive the supplies that finally arrive, compromising their own security as well as revealing the villagers to any watchful Taliban as being NATO sympathizers. If this isn't bad enough, the smirking "shooters" tell them the doctor has run out of supplies and they must walk back to their village, essentially empty handed. If these Canadians had M113 Gavins instead of LAV3Stryker wheels they could have DROVE the doctor cross-country to the village and done medical assistance and passed out whatever supplies they had---discreetly in a designated home. Clearly, nation-state war narcissists receiving full-time pay/benefits (welfare recipients in sexy uniforms) wrongly look down on these "ragheads" as "slackers" looking for a "free hand-out" when really they are Islamofascism victims who with a little help might be our friends-for-life if we respect their dignity and follow-thru with our promises.
To CYA, the FOB is suddenly dismantled and removed from the area; violating the proven ink blot strategy of counter-insurgency which is to stay and expand goodwill. (Less) Channel: youtube
5,
01:14,
2008-07-31 18:03:26
Description: How "fast" is a LAV-III/Stryker truck stuck in the mud?
62 mph?
No, Strykers are restricted to less than 45 mph lest they turn-over.
25 mph?
No.
Try, 0 MPH.
So much for the (More) How "fast" is a LAV-III/Stryker truck stuck in the mud?
62 mph?
No, Strykers are restricted to less than 45 mph lest they turn-over.
25 mph?
No.
Try, 0 MPH.
So much for the "high speed" of the wheeled trucktards in the U.S. Army and morines who are all about what WRONG LOOKS LIKE. The LAV-1 ill-equipped, moron marines are understandable; THEY ARE MORONS. Its expected for them to "do stupid" because they are stupid. The Army however, has years of institutional knowledge of WHAT RIGHT LOOKS LIKE---its years of winning wars with tracked tanks--and knows better than to be road-bound, motorized infantiles.
http://www.geocities.com/wheelsvstracks
We should stop supplying wheeled targets for ragheads to have fun with high-explosives and their garage door opener "play stations". (Less) Channel: youtube
1,
00:35,
2008-12-16 08:33:47
Description: Big Boys Toys 2008 - Part 12
NZ Army troops jump back in the LAV.
15 November, 2008
Big Boys Toys
Auckland Showgrounds
Greenlane
Auckland, New Zealand
Disclaimer:
This YouTube channel (More) Big Boys Toys 2008 - Part 12
NZ Army troops jump back in the LAV.
15 November, 2008
Big Boys Toys
Auckland Showgrounds
Greenlane
Auckland, New Zealand
Disclaimer:
This YouTube channel is in no way associated with any of the organisations portrayed. (Less) Channel: youtube
0,
00:29,
2009-05-18 07:30:16
Description: at the range putting 25mm into a the tgt which was a left over junker
Channel: youtube
1,
04:44,
2009-07-23 20:11:40
Description: Canadian Forces Provinical Reconstruction Team Riding in a LAV III with an RG-31 Nyala Mine Resistant Vehicle Ahead of it.
Channel: youtube
7,
03:04,
2008-01-28 10:22:50
Description: CFB VALCARTIER, Quebec --
Upgrades to the M113 Gavin making it equivalent to the American "M113A3" version give it more horsepower, and even more maneuverability since horrific wheeled (More) CFB VALCARTIER, Quebec --
Upgrades to the M113 Gavin making it equivalent to the American "M113A3" version give it more horsepower, and even more maneuverability since horrific wheeled LAV-III losses moving linearly along roads/trails in Afghanistan and constantly getting stuck
http://www.combatreform.com/strykerhorrors.htm
have revealed to the non-Trucktards that TRACKS are the way to move non-linearly on the non-linear battlefield.
http://www.geocities.com/wheelsvstracks
There are still an ignorant Trucktard minority in Canada that whine and cry about the failures of wheeled trucks in the face of mere rebels with a few guns and old artillery shells but they are dying off faster than the poor young Soldier victims are who they condemned with their French avant garde' stupidity that somehow the laws of physics would be different for them and their air-filled rubber-tired trucks unlike the 11 decades of wheeled failure experienced in the first place.
http://www.combatreform.com/lavdanger.htm
Notice in the video the Canadian Gavins driving THROUGH WATER AND MUD nearly up to the hull top that a LAV-III/Stryker would get mired in! Maybe trucktards are "fair weather play soldiers" while REAL SOLDIERS are ready to fight in any clime or place!
Want to know more?
Our book, "Air-Mech-Strike: Asymmetric Maneuver Warfare for the 21st Century" is ONLINE for FREE skyjacked by Google!
http://books.google.com/books?id=RCWtHnYZ0LMC&pg (Less) Channel: youtube
1,
01:49,
2008-10-12 22:27:24
Description: My Vehicule Based on a LAV III.
http://www.military-today.com/apc/kodiak.jpg
Channel: youtube
Recent searches
Recently watched videos
Quicklist (0)
